What Kind of Ontological Categories for Geo-ontologies?

Tambassi, Timothy

doi:10.1007/s12136-018-0370-7

Cited by 8 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Harapannya geografi memiliki pengertian yang sesuai dengan dinamika perkembangan ilmu geografi secara regional dan global. Domain ontologi geografi menekankan akses informasi secara konseptual yang dibangun oleh manusia sesuai dinamika perkembangan ilmu pengetahuan dan teknologi (Tambassi, 2019). Disinilah tantangan komunitas geografi di Indonesia harus mampu menjawab perkembangan ilmu secara ontologi dengan penguatan penelitian serta hilirisasi melalui pendidikan mulai dasar sampai perguruan tinggi.…”

Section: Paradigma Filsafat Geografi Kontemporerunclassified

Paradigma Filsafat Geografi Kontemporer: Kajian Ontologi, Epistemologi, Aksiologi, dan Keterampilan Sainstik

Ikhsan,

Utaya,

Bachri

et al. 2024

MGI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstrak Paradigma filsafat geografi mengalami dinamika perkembangan ilmu pengetahuan secara teori, metodelogi, dan aplikasi. Perkembangan keilmuan geografi dipengaruhi isu global, metode penelitian, statistik, komputer, internet, big data, lingkungan, manusia, dan kebijakan. Tantangan kontemporer kajian filsafat geografi harus mampu menunjukkan perkembangan ilmu geografi secara dimensi sejarah dan waktu yang terjadi sampai dengan saat ini. Artikel ini bertujuan memberikan gambaran perkembangan filsafat ilmu geografi dengan kajian ontologi, epistemologi, aksiologi, dan keterampilan sainstifik secara kontenporer. Kajian ontologi mendefinisikan geografi aspek ruang konkrit dan abstrak berdasarkan makna material fenomena geosfer. Aspek epistemologi menekankan proses metode penelitian berbasis lapangan dan online sesuai perkembangan teknologi menggunakan pendekatan deduktif atau induktif fokus pada teori maupun pengetahuan. Aspek aksiologi memberikan kebermanfaatan ilmu geografi secara online dan kehidupan manusia. Kajian filsafat geografi kontemporer menekankan penguatan konten ruang lingkup geografi berdasarkan hasil penelitian dan diaplikasikan melalui pendidikan sehingga terjadi proses hilirisasi paradigma pengetahuan. Hubungan filsafat geografi kontemporer sesuai hasil pemikiran filosofis merujuk teori dan temuan penelitian yang meningkatkan muatan esensi ilmu geografi. Penafsiran filosofis menunjukkan hakikat bidang pemikiran tentang ruang alam dan manusia. Studi perkembangan filsafat geografi kontemporer untuk menemukan pembenaran rasional secara konteks generalisasi dan sistematika faktual dengan mencermati kesenjangan pengetahuan geografi melalui proses metodelogi ilmiah. Aspek konseptual dan terminologi filsafat geografi kontemporer ditentukan tren pendekatan metodelogi ilmiah yang digunakan untuk studi geografi. Ciri khusus analisis paradigma filsafat geografi kontemporer pada saat ini hasil kombinasi harmonis landasan ilmiah dan filosofis yang konkret secara obyektif menunjukkan hubungan sains dan filsafat. Proses eksplorasi filosofis dan geografis menjadi contoh konkret berbagai riset geografi modern secara inter disiplin atau multidiplin ilmu. Pendekatan terpadu kajian analisis ruang geografi menjadi entitas dialektika metodelogi dari model tradisional menuju pendekatan integrasi menjadi identitas geografi kontemporer.Abstract The paradigm of philosophy geography experiences the dynamics scientific development in theory, methodology and application. The scientific development geography is influenced by global issues, research methods, statistics, computers, internet, big data, environment, people, and policies. The contemporary challenge of studying philosophy geography is to be able to show development of geography in terms history and time that has occurred up to now. This article aims to provide an overview development of the philosophy geography with a contemporary study ontology, epistemology, axiology, and scientific skills. The study of ontology defines geography concrete and abstract aspects space based on the material meaning geosphere phenomena. The epistemological aspect emphasizes process field-based and online research methods according to technological developments using a deductive or inductive approach focusing on theory and knowledge. The axiological aspect provides the benefit of online geography and human life. Contemporary geographical philosophy studies emphasize the strengthening of geographic scope content based on research results and applied through education so that a knowledge paradigm downstreaming process occurs. The relationship between contemporary geographical philosophy and results of philosophical thought refer to theories and research findings that increase the essence of geographic science. Philosophical interpretation shows the nature of the field thinking about natural and human space. Study of the development contemporary geographical philosophy to find rational justification the context of factual generalizations and systematics by examining gaps in geographical knowledge through process scientific methodology. Conceptual aspects and terminology contemporary geographical philosophy determine trends in scientific methodological approaches used for study of geography. The special characteristic analysis of contemporary geographical philosophical paradigms time is the result of a harmonious combination concrete scientific and philosophical foundations that objectively shows relationship between science and philosophy. The process of philosophical and geographical exploration is a concrete example various modern geographical research in an interdisciplinary or multidisciplinary manner. An integrated approach study geographic become metodhological analysis dialectical from traditional models to contemporary geographic identity.

show abstract

Section: Paradigma Filsafat Geografi Kontemporerunclassified

Paradigma Filsafat Geografi Kontemporer: Kajian Ontologi, Epistemologi, Aksiologi, dan Keterampilan Sainstik

Ikhsan,

Utaya,

Bachri

et al. 2024

MGI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Following Barry Smith's and Bert Klagges's arguments (2008), a possible answer to this deals with the main aims of (applied) ontology as a discipline. According to the authors, ontology should not only: 5.3 draft a complete inventory of reality (or some of its parts) by specifying its hierarchical and categorial structure (see also Varzi, 2005;Tambassi, 2019a); 5.4 establish whether the whole reality can be described with one single system of categories or whether the various aspects of reality emerging from diverse areas of research need a multiplicity of ontological systems.…”

Section: Ontological Integrationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ontological Perspectivism and Geographical Categorizations

Tambassi

2021

Philosophia

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

According to ontological perspectivism, there can be, in principle, multiple and alternative perspectives on the world that can be sliced, systematized, and conceptualized in different ways. Surely, such an ontological position has many categorial implications, which may vary depending on different disciplinary contexts. This paper explores parts of these implications in the realm of geography. In particular, it aims at discussing the ontological categories that one might use to describe the geographical world in an overarching perspective – that is, the perspective that puts toether all the partial views coming from the different branches of the geographical investigation. We will see that if the overarching perspective is expected to include all the views on the geographical world, then such a perspective should be all-embracing in terms of contents and categories. This means that the overarching perspective might also comprehend inconsistencies that derive from how the various partial perspectives conceptualize differently the geographical world.

show abstract

“…For example, in quantum mechanics, we may need a structuralist system of categories with such and such categories, while in biology we may need a substantialist system of categories with such and such categories. Tambassi (: 32) has emphasized that the number of categories and the completeness of systems of categories in geo‐ontologies, that is, computational ontologies about the geographical world, is always variant. Cumpa (: 152) has argued that non‐Aristotelian ontologies can dispense with the Aristotelian problem of the number of categories and the completeness of systems of categories.…”

Section: Number and Completenessmentioning

confidence: 99%

What Kind of Ontological Categories for Geo-ontologies?

Cited by 8 publications

References 15 publications

Paradigma Filsafat Geografi Kontemporer: Kajian Ontologi, Epistemologi, Aksiologi, dan Keterampilan Sainstik

Paradigma Filsafat Geografi Kontemporer: Kajian Ontologi, Epistemologi, Aksiologi, dan Keterampilan Sainstik

Ontological Perspectivism and Geographical Categorizations

Categories

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About