2004
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1874045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Lies Beneath: Determining the Necessity of International Groundwater Policy Along the United States Mexico Border and a Roadmap to an Agreement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within that small area, Oklahoma and Texas promote arguably unsustainable use of the aquifer (although that may be changing), while Colorado, Kansas, and New Mexico aim to conserve the aquifer. Having such different legal regimes governing the same aquifer within a small area can be problematic if the liberal water‐use policies of some states undermine the conservative water‐use policies of neighboring states (Hardberger 2004). Although there seem to be no past lawsuits regarding groundwater pumping in one state directly causing groundwater problems in another state in the High Plains aquifer, both recent interstate conflicts between Kansas and Colorado (regarding the Arkansas River Compact) and Kansas and Nebraska (regarding the Republican River Compact) involved impacts of groundwater pumping on interstate river flows (Sophocleous 2010).…”
Section: Water Law and Governance In The High Plains Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within that small area, Oklahoma and Texas promote arguably unsustainable use of the aquifer (although that may be changing), while Colorado, Kansas, and New Mexico aim to conserve the aquifer. Having such different legal regimes governing the same aquifer within a small area can be problematic if the liberal water‐use policies of some states undermine the conservative water‐use policies of neighboring states (Hardberger 2004). Although there seem to be no past lawsuits regarding groundwater pumping in one state directly causing groundwater problems in another state in the High Plains aquifer, both recent interstate conflicts between Kansas and Colorado (regarding the Arkansas River Compact) and Kansas and Nebraska (regarding the Republican River Compact) involved impacts of groundwater pumping on interstate river flows (Sophocleous 2010).…”
Section: Water Law and Governance In The High Plains Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…private landowners have exclusive and absolute rights over the groundwater located on their property. Accordingly, the government of Texas and the U.S. federal government have limited jurisdictional power over the private use of the resources (Hardberger 2004, 1240-2, Wurbs 2004). 107 The regulation of groundwater exploitation by public authorities would require the significant reordering of the existing water rights and the revision of a large body of jurisprudence-in other words, the reform of the principles of groundwater governance in Texas 107 Texas limits its control over groundwater rights to cases in which landowners pump groundwater with "malice or wanton waste."…”
Section: B) Few Venues For Scientific Cooperationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and the geographic and legal literature is already replete wilh excellent summaries (Matsumoto. 2002: Nanni et ai, 2002Hardberger. 2004;Burchi & Mechlem, 2005;Eckstein & Eckstein.…”
Section: A Distinctioti Between Global and International Commonsmentioning
confidence: 99%