2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What lies beneath: Material classification for autonomous excavators using proprioceptive force sensing and machine learning

Abstract: The ability of robotic excavators to acquire meaningful knowledge about materials during digging can augment their autonomous functionality, as well as optimize downstream operations in construction and mining. Some material properties, such as rock sizes, can be determined visually, but these methods cannot see what lies beneath. In this work, a classification methodology that utilizes only proprioceptive force data acquired from an autonomous digging system and machine learning algorithms is proposed for exc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the proposed method on three base classifiers are shown in Tables 2 – 4 . The base classifiers include the SVM [ 28 ], K -nearest neighbor (KNN) [ 29 ], and random forest (RF) [ 30 ] methods. The recall of plastics in the FLF method and TLF method based on the SVM classifier is 99.2%, which is higher than that of bricks, concretes, foams, and woods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the proposed method on three base classifiers are shown in Tables 2 – 4 . The base classifiers include the SVM [ 28 ], K -nearest neighbor (KNN) [ 29 ], and random forest (RF) [ 30 ] methods. The recall of plastics in the FLF method and TLF method based on the SVM classifier is 99.2%, which is higher than that of bricks, concretes, foams, and woods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, better results were achieved from one-class SVM (OC-SVM) and SVDD. Fernando and Marshall [13] performed a state of the art classification methodology for rock and gravel, by identifying force data (proprioceptive force data) acquired from load-haul-dump equipment with capacity of 14-tonne and adopting ANN, KNN, and k-mean algorithms. However, good results were obtained by ANN (5-NN) model with more realistic classification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supervised learning algorithms minimise the error between the targeted data and output data, whereas unsupervised algorithms are adopted for clustering data when data training is not preferable. However, both types of ML algorithms can be utilised for the material classifications based on the site conditions and circumstances for the availability of input data [13]. Construction material classification via ML techniques has gained a lot of attention among professionals and researchers in the construction sector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bunrit [24]. Fernando and Marshal presented a classi cation methodology for excavation material identi cation utilizing only proprioceptive force data acquired from an autonomous digging system and three machine learning algorithms including KNN (K Nearest Neighbor), ANN, and k-means [25]. Davis et al designed and described a deep CNN to identify seven typical Construction and Demolition Waste (C&DW) classi cations using digital images of waste deposited in a construction site bin [26].…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%