DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-8825-4_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Linguistic Universals Can Be True Of

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, infants detected a fricative to stop change but not vice versa (see also Altvater-Mackensen, 2010). They interpreted these findings in terms of emerging phonological representations in early lexical development, upholding the view that stops are initially lexicallyphonologically unspecified, whereas fricatives are specified (see also Lahiri & Plank, 2009;Lahiri & Reetz, 2003). Altvater-Mackensen and Fikkert dismissed acoustic/perceptual salience as a factor contributing to the asymmetric performance in this study.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…In this study, infants detected a fricative to stop change but not vice versa (see also Altvater-Mackensen, 2010). They interpreted these findings in terms of emerging phonological representations in early lexical development, upholding the view that stops are initially lexicallyphonologically unspecified, whereas fricatives are specified (see also Lahiri & Plank, 2009;Lahiri & Reetz, 2003). Altvater-Mackensen and Fikkert dismissed acoustic/perceptual salience as a factor contributing to the asymmetric performance in this study.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…This type of Unrenderable task is eluded by giving up equivalence at the term level in pursuance of non-equivalent terms to attain a reasonable extent of equivalence at the new level. Wierzbicka,1991;Lahiri,& Plank, 2009). Culturally, Arabic and English vary markedly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Language universals have been investigated from two different perspectives in linguistics: on the one hand, the typological, functional or Greenbergian approach; and on the other hand, the formal or Chomskyan approach [28]. From the typological point of view, taking into account the limited data available, the universals are derived inductively from a cross-linguistic sample of grammatical structures [29].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, "The empirical basis of universals research can only be (a sample of) a subset of the domain for which universals could maximally claim validity, and have traditionally been claiming validity: that of humanly possible languages. Therefore, the only viable domain for universals research, then, is all-languages-present-and-past-as-known-to-usnow" [33].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%