2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.06.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What makes a “good” colonoscopy quality indicator?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10,11 Therefore, the endoscopist's ability to detect neoplastic lesion during the colonoscopy, the so-called adenoma detection rate (ADR), had become the most important quality indicator to measure the quality of the examination itself and the performer. [12][13][14] The association of ADR and incident CRC or PCCRC have been explored and are well-established in the body of evidence. Kaminski et al 15 reported that subjects receiving colonoscopy performed by endoscopists with higher average ADR (≥20.0%) would result in a significantly lower incidence of PCCRC.…”
Section: Introduction: Why Adr Is So Important?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,11 Therefore, the endoscopist's ability to detect neoplastic lesion during the colonoscopy, the so-called adenoma detection rate (ADR), had become the most important quality indicator to measure the quality of the examination itself and the performer. [12][13][14] The association of ADR and incident CRC or PCCRC have been explored and are well-established in the body of evidence. Kaminski et al 15 reported that subjects receiving colonoscopy performed by endoscopists with higher average ADR (≥20.0%) would result in a significantly lower incidence of PCCRC.…”
Section: Introduction: Why Adr Is So Important?mentioning
confidence: 99%