2020
DOI: 10.1177/2050303220911149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What makes Critical Religion critical? A response to Russell McCutcheon

Abstract: This is a response to Russell McCutcheon's (2018) book chapter titled "On Concepts and Entities: Varieties of Critical Scholarship" in which he criticizes the value-driven approached advocated in previous editorials of Critical Research on Religion. This response points out that critical religion (the approach of McCutcheon and others) is also value-driven and not nonnormative as he claims, but that this is what makes it critical.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Going a step further, such an approach is related to what Charles R. Hale calls cultural critique in anthropology, "an approach to research and writing in which political alignment is manifested through the content of the knowledge produced, not through the relationship established with an organized group of people in struggle" (Hale 2006, 98). The rapidly developing sub-discipline of critical study of religion(s) operates within a similar paradigm (Goldstein 2020;Miller 2022) rooted in a constructivist theory of religion that privileges the translation and deconstruction of particular categories. We recognise that in the study of religion(s), such deconstruction, and the "disenchantment" it entails, may also have significant social implications, for example on processes of social imagination.…”
Section: Activist Approach In Studying Religion: Toward the Radical S...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Going a step further, such an approach is related to what Charles R. Hale calls cultural critique in anthropology, "an approach to research and writing in which political alignment is manifested through the content of the knowledge produced, not through the relationship established with an organized group of people in struggle" (Hale 2006, 98). The rapidly developing sub-discipline of critical study of religion(s) operates within a similar paradigm (Goldstein 2020;Miller 2022) rooted in a constructivist theory of religion that privileges the translation and deconstruction of particular categories. We recognise that in the study of religion(s), such deconstruction, and the "disenchantment" it entails, may also have significant social implications, for example on processes of social imagination.…”
Section: Activist Approach In Studying Religion: Toward the Radical S...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Democracy requires informed citizens who are able to critically evaluate their sources of information, and that is where we as educators can be of service. There are some in academia who argue that social science ought to be value free or that the study of religion should be non-normative (see Goldstein 2020). In our editorials, we have argued the opposite—that critique is value driven.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%