2022
DOI: 10.1177/01461672221105966
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Makes Touch Comfortable? An Examination of Touch Giving and Receiving in Two Cultures

Abstract: This study examined how touch role and culture shape affective touch experiences. Germans ( N = 130) and Chinese ( N = 130) were surveyed once as toucher and once as touchee. For different touch actions, they (a) provided free-text descriptions of what prompts touch, (b) indicated with whom touch feels comfortable, and (c) highlighted areas of touch comfort on a body outline. Overall, touch was prompted by affectionate feelings, was more comfortable with more closely bonded individuals, and when directed at th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
7
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
(150 reference statements)
1
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, subtle differences in how the pandemic was handled nationally as well as other interindividual variables could be relevant in modulating psychophysical responses to touch. Although, the present and previous research, in various cultures, has shown that the inverted u-shaped pleasantness is relatively stable on a group level (Croy et al, 2021; Cruciani et al, 2021; Schirmer et al, 2019), variables such as touch frequency, touch manners, or current ideology have been linked to the feelings elicited by touch (Sailer & Ackerley, 2019; Schirmer, Cham, et al, 2022; Sorokowska et al, 2021). Future research is required to understand whether and how these variables moderate the effect of velocity and other motion properties on the subjective evaluation of stroking touch.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…Thus, subtle differences in how the pandemic was handled nationally as well as other interindividual variables could be relevant in modulating psychophysical responses to touch. Although, the present and previous research, in various cultures, has shown that the inverted u-shaped pleasantness is relatively stable on a group level (Croy et al, 2021; Cruciani et al, 2021; Schirmer et al, 2019), variables such as touch frequency, touch manners, or current ideology have been linked to the feelings elicited by touch (Sailer & Ackerley, 2019; Schirmer, Cham, et al, 2022; Sorokowska et al, 2021). Future research is required to understand whether and how these variables moderate the effect of velocity and other motion properties on the subjective evaluation of stroking touch.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…Compared with the original TEAQ, the simplified Chinese version was characterized by a clear three-factor structure (Attitude to Intimate Touch (AIT), Childhood Touch (ChT), and Current Positive Touch (CPT). Although China belongs to a low-touch culture, there is no significant difference between Chinese and Western subjects in the experience of touch pleasure, which shows that the differences between China and Western high-touch culture countries are mainly reflected in the culture of how to use touch in social interaction norms rather than personal pleasure in touch [ 52 ]. Since Chinese people also get a high sense of pleasure from social touch with acquaintances, they hold a positive attitude towards touch.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, the kissing, hugging and sex-related items were excluded in “cultural and linguistic adaptation” section, which is consistent with previous researches. Researches on the positive effects of touch mainly focus on the nonsexual touch [ 52 ]. Sex-related items were also excluded in revision of Russian TEAQ [ 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is why most of the participants would explain their views regarding touch by referring to religion, they would mention the notion of Mehram (a person who is allowed to stay with Muslim women without the need for coverings of the veil), and Na'mehram (a person who fulfills the criteria of getting married to), with respect to cross-gender touch even if not asked about it. That is why touch is said to be culture-specific (Schirmer et al 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%