What matters most: Randomized controlled trial of breast cancer surgery conversation aids across socioeconomic strata

Abstract

Background Women of lower socioeconomic status (SES) with early‐stage breast cancer are more likely to report poorer physician‐patient communication, lower satisfaction with surgery, lower involvement in decision making, and higher decision regret compared to women of higher SES. The objective of this study was to understand how to support women across socioeconomic strata in making breast cancer surgery choices. Methods We conducted a 3‐arm (Option Grid, Picture Option Grid, and usual care), multisite, randomized controlled superiority trial with surgeon‐level randomization. The Option Grid (text only) and Picture Option Grid (pictures plus text) conversation aids were evidence‐based summaries of available breast cancer surgery options on paper. Decision quality (primary outcome), treatment choice, treatment intention, shared decision making (SDM), anxiety, quality of life, decision regret, and coordination of care were measured from T0 (pre‐consultation) to T5 (1‐year after surgery. Results Sixteen surgeons saw 571 of 622 consented patients. Patients in the Picture Option Grid arm (n = 248) had higher knowledge (immediately after the visit [T2] and 1 week after surgery or within 2 weeks of the first postoperative visit [T3]), an improved decision process (T2 and T3), lower decision regret (T3), and more SDM (observed and self‐reported) compared to usual care (n = 257). Patients in the Option Grid arm (n = 66) had higher decision process scores (T2 and T3), better coordination of care (12 weeks after surgery or within 2 weeks of the second postoperative visit [T4]), and more observed SDM (during the surgical visit [T1]) compared to usual care arm. Subgroup analyses suggested that the Picture Option Grid had more impact among women of lower SES and health literacy. Neither intervention affected concordance, treatment choice, or anxiety. Conclusions Paper‐based conversation aids improved key outcomes over usual care. The Picture Option Grid had more impact among disadvantaged patients. Lay Summary The objective of this study was to understand how to help women with lower incomes or less formal education to make breast cancer surgery choices. Compared with usual care, a conversation aid with pictures and text led to higher knowledge. It improved the decision process and shared decision making (SDM) and lowered decision regret. A text‐only conversation aid led to an improved decision process, more coordinated care, and higher SDM compared to usual care. The conversation aid with pictures was more helpful for women with lower income or less formal education. Conversation aids with pictures and text helped women make better breast cancer surgery choices.

Universal social needs assessment in gynecologic oncology: An important step toward more informed and targeted care in the public safety net

“…29 Although a clinic visit cannot raise a patient's literacy level, the identification of individuals who need help reading hospital materials can result in reflex action to allocate resources to this need, improving physicianpatient communication and patient education efforts. 30 Recognizing the low health literacy within our patient population, our clinic routinely uses practices to minimize the risk of miscommunication, including the use of certified medical interpreter services and audiovisual aids. In addition, although our group has previously published on the role of socially determined cancer care navigation as a means to improve the timeliness of guideline-based care and access to resources for underserved patients with cervical cancer, we continue to explore the role of telehealth to improve care navigation and patient advocacy.…”

Using Mixed Methods With Multiple Stakeholders to Inform Development of a Breast Cancer Screening Decision Aid for Women With Limited Health Literacy

“… 29 , 30 However, formatting elements including directionality and color may be interpreted differently among patients and should be tested with LHL groups before use. 31 Finally, the need to address provider discomfort with risk assessment tools and build skills around risk communication can enhance SDM. Ultimately, without a comprehensive understanding of what PCPs do/do not cover and what patients with LHL prefer in DAs, the potential for unmet information needs is high, as we have documented through this analysis.…”

Implementation and sustainability factors of two early-stage breast cancer conversation aids in diverse practices

“…Compared with usual care, Picture Option Grid had more impact on knowledge and quality of life among disadvantaged patients. There was insufficient evidence to suggest that the interventions affected treatment choice or anxiety [28]. There was substantial variation within outcomes between surgeons, emphasizing the usefulness of optimal and standardized implementation strategies.…”