2021
DOI: 10.1111/inm.12835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“What matters to me”: A multi‐method qualitative study exploring service users’, carers’ and clinicians’ needs and experiences of therapeutic engagement on acute mental health wards

Abstract: Nurse–patient therapeutic engagement on acute mental health wards is beneficial to service users’ outcomes and nurses’ job satisfaction. However, engagement is not always fulfilled in practice and interventions to improve engagement are sparse and ineffective. We explored the experiences of service users, carers, and clinicians drawing from 80 hours of non‐participant observations in an acute mental health ward and semi‐structured interviews with 14 service users, two carers, and 12 clinicians. Analysis of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence to‐date suggests that nurses are struggling with therapeutic engagement (McAllister & McCrae, 2017; McKeown, 2015), due to non‐engagement and more wide‐ranging issues such as time constraints which limit the amount of time nurses can spend interacting with service users (Harris and Panozzo, 2019) and an increase in administration (Seed et al, 2010; Ward & Cowman, 2007). As a result nurses may use custodial methods of care to maintain safety and to manage service users that present with challenging behaviour, custodial methods of care can then become a barrier to effective engagement (Cutcliffe et al, 2015; McAllister et al, 2021). The evidence suggests that there are potential solutions to these difficulties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence to‐date suggests that nurses are struggling with therapeutic engagement (McAllister & McCrae, 2017; McKeown, 2015), due to non‐engagement and more wide‐ranging issues such as time constraints which limit the amount of time nurses can spend interacting with service users (Harris and Panozzo, 2019) and an increase in administration (Seed et al, 2010; Ward & Cowman, 2007). As a result nurses may use custodial methods of care to maintain safety and to manage service users that present with challenging behaviour, custodial methods of care can then become a barrier to effective engagement (Cutcliffe et al, 2015; McAllister et al, 2021). The evidence suggests that there are potential solutions to these difficulties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visiting hours, smartphones, gardens and activities are all occasions for the patients to interact with one another, with external visitors (McAllister et al . 2021 ) and with the staff, and all of these possibilities can contribute to the ward’s climate and therapeutic relationships.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To respond to the experiences and issues raised by parents and health professionals, EBCD, an established technique for gathering experiences and for co-design, was used [20][21][22]27,32,[50][51][52]. It has been applied for the first time in this study to explore parents' and health professionals' experiences with the communication of positive NBS results.…”
Section: Co-designed Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%