2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2013.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What model for entry in first-price auctions? A nonparametric approach

Abstract: We develop a nonparametric approach that allows one to discriminate among alternative models of entry in …rst-price auctions. Three models of entry are considered: Levin and Smith (1994), Samuelson (1985), and a new model in which the information received at the entry stage is imperfectly correlated with valuations. We derive testable restrictions that these three models impose on the quantiles of active bidders' valuations, and develop nonparametric tests of these restrictions. We implement the tests on a dat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
80
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Potential bidders have independent private values, observe signals of their values prior to entry, and choose whether to incur a fixed entry cost, with entrants learning their values and submitting bids. This framework flexibly nests a wide range of existing models as special cases, including the affiliated-signal (AS) models of Marmer, Shneyerov, and Xu (2013) and Gentry and Li (2014) (which build on the indicative bidding model of Ye (2007)), the mixed-strategy entry model of Levin and Smith (1994), the perfectly selective entry model of Samuelson (1985), and models with risk averse bidders but exogenous entry including Guerre, Perrigne, and Vuong (2009) and Campo, Guerre, Perrigne, and Vuong (2011). It thereby represents a natural focal point for researchers seeking to understand the structural interaction between risk aversion and entry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Potential bidders have independent private values, observe signals of their values prior to entry, and choose whether to incur a fixed entry cost, with entrants learning their values and submitting bids. This framework flexibly nests a wide range of existing models as special cases, including the affiliated-signal (AS) models of Marmer, Shneyerov, and Xu (2013) and Gentry and Li (2014) (which build on the indicative bidding model of Ye (2007)), the mixed-strategy entry model of Levin and Smith (1994), the perfectly selective entry model of Samuelson (1985), and models with risk averse bidders but exogenous entry including Guerre, Perrigne, and Vuong (2009) and Campo, Guerre, Perrigne, and Vuong (2011). It thereby represents a natural focal point for researchers seeking to understand the structural interaction between risk aversion and entry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Marmer, Shneyerov, and Xu (2013) develop nonparametric specification tests for the perfectly selective (Samuelson 10 The presence of entry implies that optimal bidding is characterized by a slightly different first order condition, but the systems are otherwise identical.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 While not universal in the literature, the assumption of unknown n is common in applied studies: see, for instance, Zheng (2009), Marmer, Shneyerov, andXu (2013), GL (2014) and Li, Lu, and Zhao (2014) among others. For closely related studies assuming both N and n are common knowledge, see for example Levin and Smith (1994) or Smith and Levin (1996) among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, valuations are stochastically increasing in N if a group of bidders sampled from a larger auction tend to have higher valuations than a group of bidders sampled from a smaller auction, where "higher" is measured as a first-order stochastic dominance ranking of the highest order statistic. In Appendix A.2, we discuss three standard models of endogenous participation in auctions -those of Levin and Smith (1996), Samuelson (1985), and Marmer, Shneyerov, and Xu (2010) -and show conditions under which equilibrium play in each model would lead to valuations stochastically increasing in N . Thus, our definition of stochastically increasing valuations accommodates many standard models of endogenous entry.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theorem A3 If a symmetric equilibrium exists in cutoff strategies, then the entry game of Marmer, Shneyerov, and Xu (2010) generates valuations stochastically increasing in N .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%