What motivates academic dishonesty in students? A reinforcement sensitivity theory explanation

Abstract

Background Academic dishonesty (AD) is an increasing challenge for universities worldwide. The rise of the Internet has further increased opportunities for students to cheat. Aims In this study, we investigate the role of personality traits defined within Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST) as potential determinants of AD. RST defines behaviour as resulting from approach (Reward Interest/reactivity, goal‐drive, and Impulsivity) and avoidance (behavioural inhibition and Fight–Flight–Freeze) motivations. We further consider the role of deep, surface, or achieving study motivations in mediating/moderating the relationship between personality and AD. Sample A sample of UK undergraduates (N = 240). Method All participants completed the RST Personality Questionnaire, a short‐form version of the study process questionnaire and a measure of engagement in AD, its perceived prevalence, and seriousness. Results Results showed that RST traits account for additional variance in AD. Mediation analysis suggested that GDP predicted dishonesty indirectly via a surface study approach while the indirect effect via deep study processes suggested dishonesty was not likely. Likelihood of engagement in AD was positively associated with personality traits reflecting Impulsivity and Fight–Flight–Freeze behaviours. Surface study motivation moderated the Impulsivity effect and achieving motivation the FFFS effect such that cheating was even more likely when high levels of these processes were used. Conclusions The findings suggest that motivational personality traits defined within RST can explain variance in the likelihood of engaging in dishonest academic behaviours.

Academic dishonesty among university students: The roles of the psychopathy, motivation, and self-efficacy

“…It confirms that the "successful psychopath" [56] may be characterized by boldness but not antisocial behavior. Of all the facets of psychopathy, disinhibition was the strongest predictor of academic dishonesty, which confirms the role of impulsivity in predicting risky behavior [57,58], and the role of delaying gratification in refraining from academic transgressions [59].…”

Challenges in Teaching Palliative Care Module Virtually during COVID-19 Era

“…Study findings suggested that chances of student cheating are significantly high on web-based assessment. [ 10 ] To ensure legitimate online assessment, some measures were taken by faculty. The online test paper uploaded on VLE was password protected and time-bound.…”

Relationship between Statistics Anxiety and Academic Dishonesty: A Comparison between Learning Environments in Social Sciences

“…Academic dishonesty, i.e., unethical academic behavior, is also a practical issue questioning learning's effectivity in the long run. Academic Dishonesty strongly correlates with subsequent unethical behavior in the workplace [20].…”