2019
DOI: 10.1080/19325037.2019.1663379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Motivates Individuals to Get Obesity Related Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Tests? A Reasoned Action Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The desire to have more knowledge about potential health risks was identified as an important motivation to seek out testing for both people that had received DTC testing [33,[40][41][42] and in other surveys where participants had not necessarily actively sought out genetic testing, but rather had received a test through participating in research cohorts or studies [43][44][45][46][47]. Obtaining information to inform adoption of behaviours or treatments to improve health, prevent disease onset or manage risk were also important motivating factors for DTC customers [33,[40][41][42] and in other survey studies [43,[45][46][47][48] and qualitative studies [49][50][51][52][53]. Several studies looked at interest in genetic testing for specific conditions and found that cancer (e.g.…”
Section: Health-related Reasons Motivate People To Get Genetic Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The desire to have more knowledge about potential health risks was identified as an important motivation to seek out testing for both people that had received DTC testing [33,[40][41][42] and in other surveys where participants had not necessarily actively sought out genetic testing, but rather had received a test through participating in research cohorts or studies [43][44][45][46][47]. Obtaining information to inform adoption of behaviours or treatments to improve health, prevent disease onset or manage risk were also important motivating factors for DTC customers [33,[40][41][42] and in other survey studies [43,[45][46][47][48] and qualitative studies [49][50][51][52][53]. Several studies looked at interest in genetic testing for specific conditions and found that cancer (e.g.…”
Section: Health-related Reasons Motivate People To Get Genetic Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This review did not assess willingness to pay for genetic tests, although some studies provided insight into the extent to which cost has an impact on people's motivation to seek genetic testing. Evidence suggests that as cost decreases, more people will be interested in predictive genetic testing [33,41,47,49,59,60]. Several included studies also found that convenience of the testing (e.g.…”
Section: Market Acceptability and Test Characteristics Affect Willing...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the studies (44.4%) were conducted in the community setting (Arevalo & Brown, 2019;Armitage, Alganem & Norman, 2017;Tucker et al, 2019;Choo & Kang, 2015;Ekúndayò et al, 2020;Griffin et al, 2018;Hales et al, 2016;Kite et al, 2018;Powers et al, 2019;Schifferdecker et al, 2016;Spurrier et al, 2018;Vandelanotte et al, 2018). In comparison, five (18.5%) were conducted in the workplace (Abdi et al, 2015a;Abdi et al, 2015b;Ott et al, 2015;Sanaeinasab et al, 2020;Silberman et al, 2020) and institutional settings, respectively (Dong & Branscum, 2019;Johnson & Annesi, 2017;Romain, Horwath & Bernard, 2018;Saghafi-Asl, Aliasgharzadeh & Asghari-Jafarabadi, 2020;Wright et al, 2020); three (11.1%) in a health care setting (de Menezes et al, 2015;Nazari et al, 2019;Winik & Bonham, 2018); and one each in a church (Lin et al, 2015) and a sports centre (Cingil & Göger, 2020).…”
Section: Study Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Powers et al, 2019;Winik & Bonham, 2018); randomised controlled trials (Abdi et al, 2015b;Armitage et al, 2017;de Menezes et al, 2015;Hales et al, 2016;Lin et al, 2015;Sanaeinasab et al, 2020;Vandelanotte et al, 2018); quasi-experimental (Cingil & Göger, 2020;Schifferdecker et al, 2016); and treatment (Johnson & Annesi, 2017). The remaining 10 (37%) were observational studies, for example, cross-sectional (Abdi et al, 2015a;Dong & Branscum, 2019;Ekúndayò et al, 2020;Nazari et al, 2019;Ott et al, 2015;Romain et al, 2018;Saghafi-Asl et al, 2020), cohort (Kite et al, 2018), longitudinal (Choo & Kang, 2015), and retrospective (Silberman et al, 2020). Meanwhile, the minimum duration of the included studies was less than three months (Tucker et al, 2019;Griffin et al, 2018;Hales et al, 2016;Powers et al, 2019;Sanaeinasab et al, 2020;Spurrier et al, 2018;Vandelanotte et al, 2018;Wright et al, 2020) and the maximum was 24 months (Johnson & Annesi, 2017).…”
Section: Study Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, experiential attitudes were commonly found in attitudes-related studies (Wan et al, 2017) and were used to measure health-related attitudes (e.g., Dong & Branscum, 2019;Head & Iannarino, 2017). This could be measured by asking participants adjectives such as unpleasant to pleasant (Fishbein & Ajzen, 2010).…”
Section: Attitudesmentioning
confidence: 99%