What motivates young physicians? – a qualitative analysis of the learning climate in specialist medical training

Abstract

BackgroundNot least the much-invoked shortage of physicians in the current and the next generation has resulted in a wide range of efforts to improve postgraduate medical training. This is also in the focus of the current healthcare policy debate. Furthermore, quality and scope of available postgraduate training are important locational advantages in the competition for medical doctors. This study investigates the preferences and concerns that German house officers (HOs) have about their current postgraduate training. It also highlights how HOs evaluate the quality of their current postgraduate training and the learning environment.MethodsHOs were asked to answer the question: “Which things are of capital importance to you personally in your medical training?”, using a free text format. The survey was conducted web based (Lime survey) and all data was anonymized. Summarizing qualitative analyses were performed using the software tool MaxQDA.ResultsA total of 255 HOs participated in this study (female: n = 129/50.6 %; male: n = 126/49.4 %; age: 32 + 6 years) associated with 17 different German hospitals and from four medical specialties. Ten categories were generated from a total of 366 free text answers: 1. methodology of learning (n = 66), 2. supervision (n = 66), 3. learning structure (n = 61), 4. teaching competence (n = 37), 5. dedication (n = 34), 6. work climate (n = 29), 7. feedback/communication (n = 22), 8. challenge/patient safety (n = 21), 9. time/resources (n = 17), 10. personal security/safety (n = 13).ConclusionsHOs want a reliable and curriculum-guided learning structure. Different studying techniques should be used with sufficient (time) resources available in a trusting and communicative learning environment. Competent and dedicated instructors are expected to give individual and specific feedback to the HOs on individual strengths and deficits. Instructors should develop educational concepts in cooperation with the HOs and at the same time avoid excessive demands on HOs or hazards to patients.

Mainstreaming genomics: training experience of hospital medical officers at the Royal Melbourne Hospital

“…When providing a training programme, it is important to ensure that a high quality, engaging and stimulating learning environment is provided 11 . Medical educational departments have used different tools to assess the quality of the ‘work/learning’ environment provided by their departments.…”

“…Medical educational departments have used different tools to assess the quality of the ‘work/learning’ environment provided by their departments. A German study of 225 HMO assessed the satisfaction of the HMO in their learning environment with a questionnaire that assessed their feedback under 10 different categories 11 . The methodology of learning, availability of adequate supervision and the learning structure were identified as the most important factors contributing to effective learning.…”

Applying a Mixed-Method Approach to Improve On-the-Job Learning and Job Satisfaction in a Cohort of Interns at a University Hospital

“…Based on an elaborate external review conducted in 2012, the Internship Committee at AKUH revamped its program, adopting the six-step approach described by Kern as an instructional design process [ 12 ]. Like other studies, a mixed model approach was adopted to evaluate satisfaction levels of stakeholders as well as an improvement in the intern's satisfaction with work-based training while allowing participants for their anonymous, spontaneous feedback without any restriction [ 3 , 15 ]. Rated as a program worth joining due to the high impact of the institution with training facilities matching international standards, structured programs with a secure workplace and good salary structure were reassuring.…”

Work-based Assessment and Co-production in Postgraduate Medical Training

“…a tick box exercise) and there has been a general lack of a programmatic approach to assessment [ 19 ], [ 20 ]. Finally, culture and the factors that enable learner engagement are also beginning to emerge that will have a major impact on how learners embrace assessment as active participants [ 21 ], [ 22 ]. These factors, among others, have led to the push for more and better work-based assessments.…”