2016
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw1147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What powers the starburst activity of NGC 1068? Star-driven gravitational instabilities caught in the act

Abstract: We explore the role that gravitational instability plays in NGC 1068, a nearby Seyfert galaxy that exhibits unusually vigorous starburst activity. For this purpose, we use the Romeo-Falstad disc instability diagnostics and data from BIMA SONG, SDSS and SAURON. Our analysis illustrates that NGC 1068 is a gravitationally unstable 'monster'. Its starburst disc is subject to unusually powerful instabilities. Several processes, including AGN/stellar feedback, try to quench such instabilities from inside out by depr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
38
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
5
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In conjunction with these, Goldbaum et al (2016) used the Enzo AMR hydrodynamics code (Bryan et al 2014) and argued that inflowing unstable gas could be responsible for the star formation activity in the inner parts of a galactic disk, since it may be sufficient enough to counterbalance the star formation that is suppressed by its feedback. Romeo & Fathi (2016) came to the same conclusion when they studied the starburst activity of a particular galaxy.…”
Section: Mergers and Disk Instabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…In conjunction with these, Goldbaum et al (2016) used the Enzo AMR hydrodynamics code (Bryan et al 2014) and argued that inflowing unstable gas could be responsible for the star formation activity in the inner parts of a galactic disk, since it may be sufficient enough to counterbalance the star formation that is suppressed by its feedback. Romeo & Fathi (2016) came to the same conclusion when they studied the starburst activity of a particular galaxy.…”
Section: Mergers and Disk Instabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…itational instabilities (Romeo & Magotsi 2017). Besides, it was also shown that this feature holds good even in the inner disc of NGC 1068, a powerful nearby Seyfert+starburst galaxy (Romeo & Fathi 2016).This is possibly the reflection of the fact that in gas-rich LSB galaxies, the self-gravities of both the stellar and the gas component dominate the disc dynamics on almost an equal footing, unlike in normal spirals where the stellar component mainly contributes to the net gravitational potential. We now compare the Q min RW values for our sample LSBs with those of the combined sample of LSBs and HSBs as was obtained by Westfall et al (2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Once the inner disc is formed, the dynamical assembly of the inner bar happened at a later stage from the same stellar content. The fact that the inner bar is older than the inner disc is explained by invoking some level of star formation happening in the inner disc (as well as in the outer regions) after the inner bar was already assembled (as it has actually been seen in simulations and observations ;Athanassoula 1992;Emsellem et al 2015;Romeo & Fathi 2016). This is not surprising: the shear exerted by the inner bar prevents star formation inside it, while the gas still present in the galaxy may continue forming stars outside.…”
Section: Ngc 1291: a Rather Contemporary Assembly Of All Structures Amentioning
confidence: 98%