What Practitioners Think of Inter-organizational ERP Requirements Engineering Practices

Daneva, Maya; Ahituv, Niv

doi:10.4018/jismd.2011070103

Cited by 7 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To implement the AHP, a focus group discussion was performed by adapting the guidelines from Martakis and Daneva (2013), Mazza and Berre (2007), and Kontio et al (2008). Focus group discussions have been applied extensively in the software engineering field for evaluation or gleaning practitioners' experiences (Daneva & Ahituv, 2011;Mazza & Berre, 2007;Kontio et al, 2008). The most appropriate participants for this purpose are the software practitioners since they have vast experience with the software process.…”

Section: Focus Group Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Untitled

2022

IJAHP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Software certification involves assessing and certifying the quality of the software process based on multiple evaluation criteria where each criterion has different importance values on the quality of the software. However, the different importance values of the evaluation criteria have not been addressed in the existing software process certification models. A systematic technique is needed to ensure that the certification results are consistent, accurate and not made arbitrarily. To address this issue, the

show abstract

Section: Focus Group Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Untitled

2022

IJAHP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The next section is implementing the focus group activity which includes planning, conducting, and analysing the outcome [21] [22]. The objective of the focus group is to evaluate and validate the MAEHI in terms of its ability in producing reliable results to be implemented in real-world environments.…”

Section: Domain Users and Experts From Malaysia Nationalmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validating the Usability Evaluation Model for Hearing Impaired Mobile Application

Nathan¹,

Hashim²,

Hussain³

et al. 2023

IJACSA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Usability is an important element that enables the identification of the efficiency for application or product. However, many applications have been developed for general users' needs and are unable to provide adequate applications usage for disabled people. This study focuses on the development of usability evaluation model and the validation process on the proposed model through experts. The developed model later evaluated by group of experts through focus group method. Focus group method enables to identify the 13 variables derived to develop the model are appropriately placed and useful in the evaluation process. The results shows that the selected variables are appropriate to identify usability of mobile application for the hearing impairment through three variables tested namely, gain satisfaction with the model, satisfaction with the model presentation, and support for tasks. Conclusively, the developed model can identify usability of mobile applications for hearing impairment and enable in identifying useful criteria to be included during application development process in real life process. As future study, the model can be tested among the hearing impairment people and practitioner to establish the results obtained which contributes to usability practitioners and application developers for the disabled.

show abstract

“…(ii) the previously published empirical studies on requirements engineering for ERP (Daneva and Ahituv, 2011;Daneva and Wieringa, 2006;Daneva, 2004;Keller and Teufel, 1998), and (iii) the previous research works on ERP from a software engineering perspective (May et al, 2013;Tchokogué et al, 2005;Kumar et al, 2003;Robertson et al, 2012;Alexander and Beus, 2011).…”

Section: The Erp Customization Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…(2) the previously published empirical studies on requirements engineering for ERP (Daneva and Ahituv, 2011;Daneva and Wieringa, 2006;Daneva, 2004;Keller and Teufel, 1998); and…”

Section: The Erp Customization Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The case study participants were selected by the first author based on his knowledge about their typicality. To ensure diversity of perspectives, the first author included practitioners that have various roles in the project; however, who shared common settings and a professional background in the industry sector of the case study company (Daneva and Ahituv, 2011).…”

Section: Context and Participantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Customer requirements based ERP customization using AHP technique

Parthasarathy¹,

Daneva

2014

Business Process Management Journal

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose – Customization is a difficult task for many organizations implementing enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems. The purpose of this paper is to develop a new framework based on customers’ requirements to examine the ERP customization choices for the enterprise. The analytical hierarchy process (AHP) technique has been applied complementarily with this framework to prioritize ERP customization choices. Design/methodology/approach – Based on empirical literature, the paper proposed an ERP customization framework anchored on the customer's requirements. A case study research method was used to evaluate the applicability of the framework in a real-life setting. In a case study with 15 practitioners working on the vendor's and the client's sides in an ERP implementation, the paper applied the framework jointly with the AHP technique to prioritize the feasible customization choices for ERP implementation. Findings – The paper demonstrates the applicability of the framework in identifying the various feasible choices for the client organization to consider when they decide to customize their selected ERP product. Research limitations/implications – Further case studies need to be carried out in various contexts to acquire knowledge about the generalizability of the observations. This will also contribute to refining the proposed ERP customization framework. Practical implications – Very few literature sources suggest methods for exploring and evaluating customization options in ERP projects from requirements engineering perspective. The proposed framework helps practitioners and consultants anchor the customization decisions on the customer's requirements and use a well-established prioritization technique, AHP, to identify the feasible customization choices for the implementing enterprise. Originality/value – No previously published research studies provide an approach to prioritize customization choices for ERP anchored on the customer's requirements.

show abstract

What Practitioners Think of Inter-organizational ERP Requirements Engineering Practices

Cited by 7 publications

References 41 publications

Untitled

Untitled

Validating the Usability Evaluation Model for Hearing Impaired Mobile Application

Customer requirements based ERP customization using AHP technique

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About