What primary health care services should residents of rural and remote Australia be able to access? A systematic review of “core” primary health care services

Abstract

BackgroundThere are significant health status inequalities in Australia between those people living in rural and remote locations and people living in metropolitan centres. Since almost ninety percent of the population use some form of primary health care service annually, a logical initial step in reducing the disparity in health status is to improve access to health care by specifying those primary health care services that should be considered as “core” and therefore readily available to all Australians regardless of where they live. A systematic review was undertaken to define these “core” services.Using the question “What primary health care services should residents of rural and remote Australia be able to access?”, the objective of this paper is to delineate those primary health care core services that should be readily available to all regardless of geography.MethodA systematic review of peer-reviewed literature from established databases was undertaken. Relevant websites were also searched for grey literature. Key informants were accessed to identify other relevant reference material. All papers were assessed by at least two assessors according to agreed inclusion criteria.ResultsData were extracted from 19 papers (7 papers from the peer-reviewed database search and 12 from other grey sources) which met the inclusion criteria. The 19 papers demonstrated substantial variability in both the number and nature of core services. Given this variation, the specification or synthesis of a universal set of core services proved to be a complex and arguably contentious task. Nonetheless, the different primary health care dimensions that should be met through the provision of core services were developed. In addition, the process of identifying core services provided important insights about the need to deliver these services in ways that are “fit-for–purpose” in widely differing geographic contexts.ConclusionsDefining a suite of core primary health care services is a difficult process. Such a suite should be fit-for-purpose, relevant to the context, and its development should be methodologically clear, appropriate, and evidence-based. The value of identifying core PHC services to both consumers and providers for service planning and monitoring and consequent health outcomes is paramount.

Care of patients with chronic disease: achievements in Australia over the past decade

“…Access to primary care in Australia is high compared with Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development countries 15 . However, barriers to access exist for both low income individuals and people in rural areas 16 , 17 . There are also major challenges in ensuring that care is appropriate to the patients' level of health literacy, culture and language 18 .…”

“…15 However, barriers to access exist for both low income individuals and people in rural areas. 16,17 There are also major challenges in ensuring that care is appropriate to the patients' level of health literacy, culture and language. 18 The use of the national telephone interpreter service is free for general practitioners, but other health professionals do not have the same level of access.…”

Upscaling the recruitment and retention of human resources for health at primary healthcare centres in Lebanon: a qualitative study

“…, Carey et al . ). The presence of an adequate number of well educated and experienced human resources for health (HRH), including physicians, nurses as well as other health professionals, is a prerequisite for the delivery of comprehensive care to individuals and communities and is highly correlated with better health outcomes, including lower mortality (Shi , , Shi et al .…”

What does it cost to provide equity of access to high quality, comprehensive primary health care in rural Australia? A pilot study

“…To date, rigorous empirical research has been undertaken into the first two questions [4][5][6][7][8] . In contrast, empirical evidence relating to the cost of delivering high quality PHC efficiently and effectively (and the extent to which these costs vary geographically) is virtually non-existent.…”