Crime and Social Policy 2012
DOI: 10.1002/9781118509807.ch5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Prospects Youth Justice? Children in Trouble in the Age of Austerity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Signs of an economic downturn began to emerge in early 2008 and Ireland entered recession in mid-2008, seeing a return to high unemployment, falling income levels and cuts in public expenditure. Public spending cuts, particularly cuts in social welfare, are likely to have 'significant consequences for poverty risks' (Russell et al, 2010: 102) and are likely to place particular strain on those already living in socially excluded contexts (Yates, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Signs of an economic downturn began to emerge in early 2008 and Ireland entered recession in mid-2008, seeing a return to high unemployment, falling income levels and cuts in public expenditure. Public spending cuts, particularly cuts in social welfare, are likely to have 'significant consequences for poverty risks' (Russell et al, 2010: 102) and are likely to place particular strain on those already living in socially excluded contexts (Yates, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is relatively easy to 'fudge' this kind of conceptual tension when times are good, but less so when one or other (or all) of these potential justifications for diversion come under attack. The idea of 'success' is further confused in the current climate with the progressive introduction of 'payment by results' into the criminal justice arena, and the associated potential for the incorporation of a new range of instrumental and cost-based criteria against which intervention programmes will be judged (see Yates, 2012).…”
Section: Diversionary Practices: Local Initiativesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And thirdly, linked with the wider pattern of reduced funding and its consequences, the associated question arises as to whether or not there is a more deliberate and intentional process at play in the withdrawal of the state from areas of human life with which it is no longer concerned (see Yates, 2012). This kind of trend appears to be legitimised by arguments for 'localism', and the delegation of responsibility (but not funding) for aspects of welfare intervention which have until recently fallen under the remit of central government, such as local welfare assistance and public health.…”
Section: Diversionary Practices: Local Initiativesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular there are issues of 'creaming' and 'parking' (Yates, 2012). With regard to the former, organisations will opt to work with the most receptive young people where there is greater certainty of financial rewards.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organisations may then 'park' the most difficult to engage, most needy, marginalised, and disadvantaged young people, where the opportunity to secure a successful outcome and generate profit is difficult to achieve. Inevitably, those young people who are the most difficult to engage and essentially the most marginalised young people within society will not benefit from this system (Yates, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%