The evaluation of competence of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients to assume
personal or collective responsibilities and the resulting legal implications is
a relevant issue.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the attitudes of different medical
specialists towards the disability of patients with Alzheimer’s disease and
practitioners’ competence to interfere with decision-making autonomy.MethodsProfessionals from different areas (Neurology, Psychiatry, Geriatrics, and
General Practice) were interviewed by one of the authors, after being
presented a fictitious clinical case which raised several topics,
namely:[1] Critical judgment and capacity of the patient
to take decisions related to daily activities;[2] The role of family physicians in nominating
trustees and caregivers.ResultsAnswers to the first question did not differ regarding degree of preservation
of awareness but at least 25% stressed that the patient must be carefully
listened to, independent of caregiver or legal representative opinion. There
were significant knowledge gaps in responses to the second question. Half of
the physicians interviewed did not have adequate information about the legal
aspects of caring for patients with Alzheimer’s disease.ConclusionsLegal aspects is a topic that must be incorporated into professional training
in order to improve attitudes toward the long-term management of patients
with dementia.