2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2017.02.004
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What psychological process is reflected in the FN400 event-related potential component?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, we identified a reduced amplitude for all pairs in the ASD group relative to TD group. Given that the FN400 potential reflects both conceptual priming and familiarity during episodic recognition [see review and recent account in Leynes et al, 2017], this amplitude decrement in the ASD group may correspond to reduced semantic processing and familiarity signal elicited by pictures within a pair. Consistent with this account, Solomon et al [2016] identified during the recognition of picture pairs after relational encoding a reduced level of familiarity awareness in their adolescent participants with ASD relative to those without ASD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, we identified a reduced amplitude for all pairs in the ASD group relative to TD group. Given that the FN400 potential reflects both conceptual priming and familiarity during episodic recognition [see review and recent account in Leynes et al, 2017], this amplitude decrement in the ASD group may correspond to reduced semantic processing and familiarity signal elicited by pictures within a pair. Consistent with this account, Solomon et al [2016] identified during the recognition of picture pairs after relational encoding a reduced level of familiarity awareness in their adolescent participants with ASD relative to those without ASD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the FN400 old/new effect can be elicited by the recognition of single items, as well as items unitized into a single‐item representation [e.g., Rhodes & Donaldson, 2007]. This FN400 potential may reflect semantic processing during recognition testing [e.g., Voss & Federmeier, 2011], or be a specific marker of familiarity‐based recognition [e.g., Bridger, Bader, Kriukova, Unger, & Mecklinger, 2012; Stróżak, Abedzadeh, & Curran, 2016], more recent paradigms leading to a mixed model [Leynes, Bruett, Krizan, & Veloso, 2017]. Consistently, the recollective nature of the LPC old/new effect has been confirmed during recollection awareness [e.g., Wynn, Daselaar, Kessels, & Schutter, 2019], source memory [e.g., Addante, Ranganath, & Yonelinas, 2012], associative recognition [e.g., Borst, Ghuman, & Anderson, 2016; Opitz & Cornell, 2006], and simultaneous EEG–fMRI recordings identified posterior hippocampal and parahippocampal generators—areas being related to the episodic memory system [Hoppstädter, Baeuchl, Diener, Flor, & Meyer, 2015].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The change in the N400 amplitude related to incongruent information at study could then lead to a greater ERP old/new effect at test. Thus, incongruity at encoding may lead to a fluency‐based response at test, and this “pop‐out” effect could be reflected at recognition time (see also Leynes, Bruett, Krizan, & Veloso, ). This encoding integration effect during recognition has been attributed to automatic object‐context binding (Hayes, Nadel, & Ryan, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, N400 amplitude has an inverse relationship with semantic priming, in which novel stimuli tend to elicit larger amplitudes than primed stimuli [i.e., priming effect; [48]. All three of these studies specifically assessed N400 amplitude at frontal electrodes (i.e., frontal N400, FN400), which has been suggested to index familiarity and conceptual implicit memory [32,80], with others suggesting [71,126], while the other used picture-name congruity [42]. Although there is some inconsistency in this small literature, particularly with different tasks and methods of calculating N400 metrics, N400 amplitude nevertheless appears to differentiate between AD and HC more consistently (76%) than N200 (18%) and P300 (60%) amplitudes.…”
Section: N400mentioning
confidence: 99%