2000
DOI: 10.1056/nejm200008243430823
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Recourse? — Liability for Managed-Care Decisions and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13 Mandates also can be confusing and can vary across states, which can sometimes make it difficult for patients and providers to know exactly who is covered, in what circumstances. Their reach is limited by ERISA so that people in self-insured plans are not covered, although our analyses did not provide reason to believe that this was an important factor.…”
Section: Discussion and Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Mandates also can be confusing and can vary across states, which can sometimes make it difficult for patients and providers to know exactly who is covered, in what circumstances. Their reach is limited by ERISA so that people in self-insured plans are not covered, although our analyses did not provide reason to believe that this was an important factor.…”
Section: Discussion and Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[38][39][40] What the Moran decision clarified is that states are also free to regulate insurance as a way to regulate the practice of medicine and protect the quality of care. There is no doubt that states are free to regulate the quality of medical care and medical practice, because medical care itself does not relate to ERISA plans.…”
Section: Implications Of the Decisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent judicial decisions suggest that managed-care organizations, although still protected by the act from claims that they must provide specific services (i.e., they cannot be challenged with respect to the scope of the services they provide), can be held responsible under state laws for the quality of the services that are de-livered with their authorization. 21 In addition, managed-care organizations in several states are being sued on the grounds of false advertising. The contention is that although their advertisements state that decisions are made by physicians, in some cases, plans deny coverage for treatments recommended by physicians or require physicians to adhere to guidelines developed by the plans, not by local providers.…”
Section: Governmentmentioning
confidence: 99%