2004
DOI: 10.1080/00016470412331294355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What's all that noise?The effect of co-morbidity on health outcome questionnaire results after knee arthroplasty

Abstract: Background We modified the Charnley Classification for hips to facilitate its use with knee arthroplasty patients and investigated what affect the different classes of co-morbidity had on the results of a spectrum of outcome questionnaires.Patients and methods 3600 patients from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Registry were surveyed by post with a variety of questionnaires ranging from multipleitem general health, to a single-item knee arthroplasty specific questionnaire. All patients also completed a co-morbidi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
39
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the simplicity of the original Charnley classification [5], surgeon-assigned classification has a high [7,21]. It was recently shown that the classification does not require splitting because patients naturally classify themselves similarly to Charnley classification definitions [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the simplicity of the original Charnley classification [5], surgeon-assigned classification has a high [7,21]. It was recently shown that the classification does not require splitting because patients naturally classify themselves similarly to Charnley classification definitions [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have focused on the complications associated with increasing comorbidity, but few have evaluated the corresponding patient-centred treatment outcomes. Whilst some studies in the field of orthopaedics have shown that comorbidity impacts on the absolute scores of function or quality of life recorded preoperatively [4] or at follow-up [5], only few studies have addressed its influence on changes in health-related outcomes after surgery, and these have produced conflicting results. In patients undergoing total hip replacement, Imamura et al [6] showed that there is no influence of comorbidity on the change in health status as measured by functional, recreational, and social activities of daily living.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…SF-36 profiles should, however, be controlled for medical comorbidities because comorbid illness would cause what has been referred to as a "background noise", blurring the potential association between HRQoL and musculoskeletal disorders (Dunbar et al 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%