There is a large amount of research suggesting that traditional assessments in higher education are outdated, and newer, more authentic assessment strategies should be pursued. One such form of authentic assessment is a portfolio of learning evidence, and another is the oral interview or oral assessment. However, the portfolio and interview are not simply method of assessment, but also primary drivers of learning and creative thinking. In mathematical education, the portfolio of learning evidence and interview assessment have not been implemented widely, although some authors have considered the implications in terms of assessmeant. This mixed-methods study examines the interplay between the use of portfolios and interview assessments in a mathematical statistics module and Fink's framework for significant learning, analysing a pre-and post-module survey including both Likert-scale and open questions. The study finds that there are indeed numerous advantages that can be gained from using these novel methods instead of traditional learning and teaching methods. Through the use of the portfolios and interview assessments, significant improvements appear in all facets of Fink's framework, namely foundational knowledge, application (and communication), integration, human dimension, caring, and learning how to learn.