What's in a Handshake? Multi-Faith Practice as a Starting Point for Christian Migration Ethics

Abstract

This article assesses the tension between cosmopolitan and communitarian approaches to the ethics of migration by analysing how the Protestant Church in Germany (EKD) has responded to the current so-called migration crisis in Europe. I argue that the statements of the EKD frame people on the move either as migrants or as Muslims. These frames come with competing ethical consequences. Whereas migrants are presented as passive victims in need of some form of support by Christians, Muslims are presented as active victimisers in need of some form of suppression by Christians. However, when the then chairman of the EKD shook hands with people on the move who were arriving at Munich station in the summer of 2015, the surplus of meaning communicated in this encounter demonstrated that these people cannot be reduced to their respective framing, thus resisting the construction of both the cosmopolitan migrant frame and the communitarian Muslim frame. Accordingly, I advocate for a re-conceptualisation of the theological ethics of migration which takes multi-faith practices, such as these handshakes, as a point of departure.

Epiphenomenal suasion: Jehovah's Witnesses and the politics of preaching against the state

“…Theopolitics as such has recently garnered the interest of anthropologists (McAllister & Napolitano 2020; 2021; see also Mahadev 2022; Napolitano 2021; Norget 2021; Oliphant 2021; Thomas 2022: 246; and for the idea being taken beyond anthropology, see Schmiedel 2022), mostly stemming from McAllister and Napolitano's reading of Brody's work on Buber. What this growing body of anthropological literature points towards is both a shift in the anthropology of religion from ‘just ethics’ back to ‘politics’, but also a broader ‘humanist’ moment in the discipline (see Thomas 2022: 246), drawing on similar veins to the work that figures politics to be otherwise, whether that is the ‘non‐political’ (e.g.…”