2018
DOI: 10.1002/mdc3.12684
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What's in a Name? Conundrums Common to the Task‐Specific Disorders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 41 Intact motor control of fingers in alterative tasks suggests that task-specific representations and mechanisms should be sought. 2 , 42 Higher-order regions of the sensorimotor are likely to be involved. For example, intensive training of sequences of finger presses is associated with the stabilization of sequence-specific activation patterns in premotor and parietal areas (whereas individual finger movements appear to be preferentially represented in M1 and S1; Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 41 Intact motor control of fingers in alterative tasks suggests that task-specific representations and mechanisms should be sought. 2 , 42 Higher-order regions of the sensorimotor are likely to be involved. For example, intensive training of sequences of finger presses is associated with the stabilization of sequence-specific activation patterns in premotor and parietal areas (whereas individual finger movements appear to be preferentially represented in M1 and S1; Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it would be interesting to know if a forcible change in handwriting or if writing with a different body part such as the foot would alter the dysgraphia. 4 The underlying abnormality is considered to be the effector specific motor program that encodes the muscle activation pattern for each grapheme. This is perhaps a valid reason for a single letter but is uncertain if the same can hold true for abnormality in a specific pattern which is present across multiple graphemes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%