2013
DOI: 10.1080/10130950.2013.809928
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What's in a name? Exploring the sexual identity of Black Women-Loving-Women in Soweto

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These have brought forth a biased geopolitics of queer academic knowledge, which consistently privileges scholarship developed in Europe and North America, while 'African material and African intellectuals tend to be overlooked, seemingly token, or relegated to the margins in ostensibly global queer literature' (Epprecht, 2008: 14). The lack of purchase of queer as an emic category in South Africa has also been demonstrated in a study of identity labels among non-heterosexual women in Soweto (Pakade, 2013; see also Sigamoney and Epprecht, 2013 for similar results). There, queer was the least used identity category vis-a-vis other labels such as lesbian and isitabane (see also Swarr, 2012 for an incisive analysis of isitabane).…”
Section: Queer Counterpointssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…These have brought forth a biased geopolitics of queer academic knowledge, which consistently privileges scholarship developed in Europe and North America, while 'African material and African intellectuals tend to be overlooked, seemingly token, or relegated to the margins in ostensibly global queer literature' (Epprecht, 2008: 14). The lack of purchase of queer as an emic category in South Africa has also been demonstrated in a study of identity labels among non-heterosexual women in Soweto (Pakade, 2013; see also Sigamoney and Epprecht, 2013 for similar results). There, queer was the least used identity category vis-a-vis other labels such as lesbian and isitabane (see also Swarr, 2012 for an incisive analysis of isitabane).…”
Section: Queer Counterpointssupporting
confidence: 56%