2018
DOI: 10.1111/hequ.12162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What's in a name? The impact of reputation and rankings on the teaching income of English universities

Abstract: This study examines the impact of universities’ reputation on teaching income and demonstrates how strongly reputation may affect the fees that they can charge. Higher Education is increasingly competitive and international, and institutions are preoccupied with national and international prestige. Research output is demonstrably central to reputation and, specifically, to global rankings, but less has been written about the benefits of high prestige for teaching income and the ability to charge high fees. Thi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An example is the Russell Group in the UK, which includes 24 elite universities that receive up to half of the funding of the whole higher education sector; their share of funding increased from 44.7 percent in 2001-2002 to 49.1 percent in 2013. 15 As governments allocate more funding to these universities, those with lower ranks are deprived of much of the necessary resources that can permit widening participation, equity in access, and diversity in higher education. As Altbach and Hazelkorn also affirm, the bibliometric data used by rankings not only devalue arts, social sciences, and humanities, where more female students end up, but also disparage "research with a regional or national orientationespecially research published in languages other than English."…”
Section: Why Are Global University Ranking Indicators Incompatible Wimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example is the Russell Group in the UK, which includes 24 elite universities that receive up to half of the funding of the whole higher education sector; their share of funding increased from 44.7 percent in 2001-2002 to 49.1 percent in 2013. 15 As governments allocate more funding to these universities, those with lower ranks are deprived of much of the necessary resources that can permit widening participation, equity in access, and diversity in higher education. As Altbach and Hazelkorn also affirm, the bibliometric data used by rankings not only devalue arts, social sciences, and humanities, where more female students end up, but also disparage "research with a regional or national orientationespecially research published in languages other than English."…”
Section: Why Are Global University Ranking Indicators Incompatible Wimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Across the world, universities have become increasingly business-like, often focusing at an institutional level on maximising income streams as opposed to focusing on the original ethos of expanding and training young minds [ 2 ]. Indeed, academics are caught up in a range of initiatives which measure job performance including global university league tables, research league tables, and student satisfaction surveys [ 3 5 ]. The better the performance across these initiatives, the more revenue a university is likely to attract.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The better the performance across these initiatives, the more revenue a university is likely to attract. These performance rankings can help determine the allocation of public resources and research funding [ 4 ], and are often used in the global competition between universities to recruit fee-paying domestic and overseas students [ 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The new educational intelligent cloud classroom today can support online real-time learning or lecturer video playback. In particular, online real-time learning requires good network conditions and cloud processors with extremely large memory space [ 18 , 19 ].…”
Section: Construction Of New Online Classroommentioning
confidence: 99%