2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11199-007-9317-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What’s in a Name? Two Approaches to Evaluating the Label Feminist

Abstract: Across two studies, we employed unique approaches to investigating the meaning of the label feminist using a sample of undergraduates from a large Northeastern university in the U.S. In Study 1 (N=60), we utilized an impression formation paradigm to investigate the meaning of the label feminist when applied to typical college student. The results revealed that feminist males were rated less favorably than nonfeminist males and feminist females were rated more favorably than nonfeminist females. In Study 2 (N=1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
4
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
40
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Within the social setting of our second study, findings fully supported our first hypothesis that women who call themselves feminists risk being the targets of both prejudice and discrimination. Specifically, unlike Breen and Karpinski's () findings that suggest it may be desirable for college women to identify themselves as feminists, we found that the same woman is evaluated less favorably by her student peers when she calls herself a feminist than when she does not do so. Furthermore, after adjustments for covariates, we found that a woman's decision to publicly describe herself as a feminist can be socially isolating because it causes others to shy away from wanting to both be her friend and date her.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Within the social setting of our second study, findings fully supported our first hypothesis that women who call themselves feminists risk being the targets of both prejudice and discrimination. Specifically, unlike Breen and Karpinski's () findings that suggest it may be desirable for college women to identify themselves as feminists, we found that the same woman is evaluated less favorably by her student peers when she calls herself a feminist than when she does not do so. Furthermore, after adjustments for covariates, we found that a woman's decision to publicly describe herself as a feminist can be socially isolating because it causes others to shy away from wanting to both be her friend and date her.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Given the paucity of prior research comparing reactions to the feminist label with those to feminist behavior, we were reluctant to offer predictions regarding people's reactions to a woman who simultaneously identifies herself as a feminist and behaves like a feminist. Breen and Karpinski's () research suggests that a woman who pairs feminist behavior with the feminist label is deemed normative and desirable by university students like those participating in our studies. However, if our assumption is correct that the stigma associated with the feminist label is a product of the threat posed by feminist behaviors geared toward countering gender inequality, it would stand to reason that people will react similarly to a woman who both identifies herself as a feminist and behaves like a feminist as they will to a woman who only does one of these two things.…”
Section: Current Studies and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is probably safe to assume that the term or concept “feminist” evokes images of women rather than men (Berryman‐Fink & Verderber, 1985; Williams & Wittig, 1997). To be clear about the sex of the feminist target, in the current study, participants rated the terms “feminist man” and “feminist woman” in addition to “man” and “woman.” This study also improves on and adds to Breen and Karpinski's research (2008); they used only three items in their measure of negative impression of feminists and nonfeminists, and their sample of men was relatively small.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Men have played and continue to play important roles in the feminist movement; however, they are much less likely than women to identify themselves as feminists (Breen & Karpinski, 2008; Burn et al, 2000; Henderson‐King & Zhermer, 2003; Jackson et al, 1996; Peltola et al, 2004; Pierce, Sydie, Stratkotter, & Krull, 2003; Williams & Wittig, 1997). As with stereotypes about feminist women, stereotypes about feminist men may negatively affect their willingness to adopt the feminist label and become active in the feminist movement.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%