2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What’s in it for Africa? European Union fishing access agreements and fishery exports from developing countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, knowledge of this reality, which may be common in developing countries, is of particular interest. Sometimes developing countries do not have sufficient government infrastructure to support exports (Hammarlund and Anderson, 2019), and it is the banks that perform these functions. Accordingly, it has been verified that banks offer banking products to meet exporting companies' needs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, knowledge of this reality, which may be common in developing countries, is of particular interest. Sometimes developing countries do not have sufficient government infrastructure to support exports (Hammarlund and Anderson, 2019), and it is the banks that perform these functions. Accordingly, it has been verified that banks offer banking products to meet exporting companies' needs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these disproportionately impacted nations may bene t from fees and clauses included within access agreements, such as clauses that ensure the distant-water shing nation processes a certain amount of catch in the host nation or employs a certain number of local people on board their shing vessels 42 , evidence suggests that only minimal compensation is received and that the terms of these access agreements are often unfavourable for hosts 43 . Therefore, while the host nations contend with the negative ecological, economic and social consequences that harmful sheries subsidies impose, most of the bene t derived from the subsidised foreign shing eets is likely captured by the distant-water shing nation 44 . High-HDI countries use their capital to gain access to resources and subsequent revenues from catches taken from low-HDI countries, and may be less incentivised to sh sustainably because they do not feel the direct impacts of over shing 38 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, statistical macroeconomic analysis has suggested that inactive fishing access agreements result in negative effects on the partner country's trade performance, reducing its trade volume and overall exporting capacity [32]. While this analysis suggests that SFPAs have a positive effect on developing countries' exports, it also hints that the agreements could cultivate market dependence in the host countries.…”
Section: Senegal and Sfpa Casementioning
confidence: 92%