What's new in the use of MRI in the orthopaedic trauma patient?

Karantanas, Apostolos H.

doi:10.1016/j.injury.2014.01.012

Cited by 7 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 58 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Due to the importance of diagnostic accuracy for surgical planning in patients with knee dislocation, evaluation of accuracy of the 3.0 T scanner may be useful. Newer imaging techniques such as 3D MRI and diffusion‐weighted MRI have also shown promise in ligamentous injuries of the knee and may improve diagnostic accuracy in patients with knee dislocation in the future [5, 10]. For bone bruise and nondisplaced extra‐articular fractures, MRI may be even more sensitive than surgery.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

How sensitive and specific is 1.5 Tesla MRI for diagnosing injuries in patients with knee dislocation?

Derby

Imrecke

Henckel

et al. 2015

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

How sensitive and specific is 1.5 Tesla MRI for diagnosing injuries in patients with knee dislocation?

Derby

Imrecke

Henckel

et al. 2015

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…MRI is the imaging modality of choice for the depiction of soft tissues. The inherent superb soft tissue contrast in combination with the absent radiation burden has rendered MRI the key imaging modality for a great variety of applications, including neurological and musculoskeletal disease [ 52 , 53 ]. The magnetic field strength of most clinical-grade magnets ranges between 1.5 T and 3 T, with 7 T systems being slowly introduced in hospitals.…”

Section: Overview Of High-resolution Imaging Techniquesmentioning

confidence: 99%

High-Resolution Imaging for the Analysis and Reconstruction of 3D Microenvironments for Regenerative Medicine: An Application-Focused Review

Klontzas

Protonotarios

2021

Bioengineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The rapid evolution of regenerative medicine and its associated scientific fields, such as tissue engineering, has provided great promise for multiple applications where replacement and regeneration of damaged or lost tissue is required. In order to evaluate and optimise the tissue engineering techniques, visualisation of the material of interest is crucial. This includes monitoring of the cellular behaviour, extracellular matrix composition, scaffold structure, and other crucial elements of biomaterials. Non-invasive visualisation of artificial tissues is important at all stages of development and clinical translation. A variety of preclinical and clinical imaging methods—including confocal multiphoton microscopy, optical coherence tomography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computed tomography (CT)—have been used for the evaluation of artificial tissues. This review attempts to present the imaging methods available to assess the composition and quality of 3D microenvironments, as well as their integration with human tissues once implanted in the human body. The review provides tissue-specific application examples to demonstrate the applicability of such methods on cardiovascular, musculoskeletal, and neural tissue engineering.

show abstract

“…63 Similarly, all avulsion fractures of the greater or lesser trochanter in adults lacking a history of significant trauma necessitate investigation via MR imaging for exploring the potential presence of underlying metastatic disease or a primary bone tumor. 70 Imaging BME surrounding a low signal intensity linear or curvilinear fracture line represents a constant finding on T1-weighted sequences in the coronal plane (►Fig. 12).…”

Section: Disease Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This single sequence was suggested to be sufficient and cost effective in identifying occult fractures. 70,71 The addition of a fluid-sensitive sequence in the coronal plane is recommended because BME becomes more conspicuous and allows detection of associated soft tissue injuries. 72 The same imaging algorithm also applies for avulsion fractures, showing variable degrees of edema in regional soft tissues and involved bones located in typical apophyseal sites.…”

Section: Disease Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

MR Imaging of the Hip: An Update on Bone Marrow Edema

Vassalou

Spanakis

Tsifountoudis

et al. 2019

Semin Musculoskelet Radiol

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bone marrow edema (BME) represents a frequent and easily detected MR imaging finding that is recognized as a common source of pain. It is considered a nonspecific finding that constitutes a central component of a wide spectrum of pathologies affecting the hip joint, showing high variability in terms of prognosis and treatment requirements. Solid knowledge of the various BME patterns and associated imaging findings indicative of these conditions can aid in differentiation. Additionally, correlation with clinical and laboratory data are essential for arriving at a final diagnosis in several cases. In this review, we describe the disease characteristics and imaging findings and also highlight the differential diagnostic clues regarding common hip disorders associated with BME including avascular necrosis, transient osteoporosis, stress injuries, and infectious/inflammatory disorders.

show abstract

What's new in the use of MRI in the orthopaedic trauma patient?

Cited by 7 publications

References 58 publications

How sensitive and specific is 1.5 Tesla MRI for diagnosing injuries in patients with knee dislocation?

How sensitive and specific is 1.5 Tesla MRI for diagnosing injuries in patients with knee dislocation?

High-Resolution Imaging for the Analysis and Reconstruction of 3D Microenvironments for Regenerative Medicine: An Application-Focused Review

MR Imaging of the Hip: An Update on Bone Marrow Edema

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About