2010
DOI: 10.1080/1350293x.2010.525939
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What's so interesting outside? A study of child‐initiated interaction with teachers in the natural outdoor environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
28
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Specific features of the new approach are the requirements to build the curriculum, in part, from the interests of the child (DCELLS 2008a, 6) and to use the outside space as a learning environment (DCELLS 2008a, 4;Waters and Maynard 2010). The Foundation Phase is for children aged from three to seven years so reception class, year one and year two children are protected from the impact of the more prescriptive approaches associated with Key Stage 1 of the National Curriculum by affording them more informal learning experiences (Maynard 2007).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific features of the new approach are the requirements to build the curriculum, in part, from the interests of the child (DCELLS 2008a, 6) and to use the outside space as a learning environment (DCELLS 2008a, 4;Waters and Maynard 2010). The Foundation Phase is for children aged from three to seven years so reception class, year one and year two children are protected from the impact of the more prescriptive approaches associated with Key Stage 1 of the National Curriculum by affording them more informal learning experiences (Maynard 2007).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A novel approach to understanding context was taken by Waters and Maynard in their study of child–teacher interactions in outdoor spaces (Waters & Maynard, 2010). Although this study is not directly concerned with a school-based LPP intervention, it is noteworthy for the methodology the researchers used to gain an insight into children’s perspectives.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outdoor learning environments and the pedagogical practices associated with them have been recognised in the past as conducive to AS (Barrable and Arvanitis 2019;Maynard 2007;Wurdinger and Paxton 2003). The affordances of the natural environment, including a great variety of flexible and open-ended play items, such as naturally occurring loose parts, offer an ideal space for child-led exploration and play (Barrable and Arvanitis 2019), as well as enhanced opportunities for deep adult-child interactions that are child-initiated and responsive to the child's own interests (Waters and Maynard 2010). These child-led interactions, as well as the provision of space and time for child-led play and exploration, can be seen as the manifestation of autonomy supportive practice in early childhood education.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%