2006
DOI: 10.1080/09589230500486918
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What's the Difference? Bringing Particularity to Queer Studies of Transgender

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
90
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
90
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Some focus on differences between sexual groups and critique those that lump sexualities while others seek to destabilize difference and critique those who would reify it. A sexual diversity lens may be a way to sidestep this boundary policingand focus instead on question-specific particularities or generalities while valuing both (for some relevant discussion, see Hines, 2006).…”
Section: Sexual Diversity Studies and Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some focus on differences between sexual groups and critique those that lump sexualities while others seek to destabilize difference and critique those who would reify it. A sexual diversity lens may be a way to sidestep this boundary policingand focus instead on question-specific particularities or generalities while valuing both (for some relevant discussion, see Hines, 2006).…”
Section: Sexual Diversity Studies and Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 -SAYI NO. 4 18 Devor 1997;Ekins ve King 2006;Hines 2006Hines , 2007aHines , 2007bLee, 2001;Namaste, 2000;Noble, 2006;Prosser, 1998;Stryker, 2006;West, 2004;Whittle, Turner ve Al-Alami 2007. 19 Öztürk, 2011.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has led to the more contemporary framing of 'transgender' as a politicalised subversion of (hetero)sexual and gender discourses and associated rigidities (see Hines &Sanger, 2010, andStryker &Whittle, 2006, for more detailed overviews). There is, however, much contestation over the politicisation of 'trans' as a vanguard of postmodern change.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is, however, much contestation over the politicisation of 'trans' as a vanguard of postmodern change. For example, strong criticism has been made of the essentialisation of transgender in queer theorisations of 'difference', neglect of the varied lived experiences of (non-White, non-middle class) trans people, and disregard of the ordinariness and diversity of transitioning (Hines, 2006;Namaste, 2000Namaste, , 2011Prosser, 1999;Richards, Barker, Lenihan & Iantaffi, 2014;Serano, 2013a)1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%