What shapes gender attitudes among adolescent girls and boys? Evidence from the UDAYA Longitudinal Study in India

Abstract

Introduction The role of gender norms in shaping education and work opportunities, distribution of power and resources, and health and wellbeing is well recognised. However, rigorous studies in low- and middle-income countries on when and how norms change over time and what factors shape adolescents’ and young adult’s gender attitudes are limited. This paper explores the factors that determine adolescents’ gender attitudes, as well as patterns in gender attitude shifts over time among younger and older adolescent boys and girls in India. Data and methods Data presented in this paper were drawn from a unique longitudinal study of adolescents aged 10–19 (Understanding the lives of adolescent and young adults–UDAYA study) in the states of Bihar and Uttar Pradesh in India, conducted during 2015–2016 (wave 1) and 2018–2019 (wave 2). The analysis presented in this paper drew on data from 4,428 boys and 7,607 girls who were aged 10–19 and unmarried at wave 1 and interviewed at both rounds of the survey. We used univariate and bivariate analyses to examine changes in adolescents’ gender role attitudes over time and the association between explanatory variables and gender role attitudes. We also used linear fixed effects regression models to identify factors that shape adolescents’ gender role attitudes. Results Gender role attitudes became more egalitarian over time among boys and girls, except among the older cohort of boys in our study. Among both younger and older cohorts, girls/young women held more egalitarian views than boys/young men and this pattern held over time for both cohorts. Factors that influenced gender role attitudes differed for younger and older adolescents, particularly among boys. While some predictors differed for boys and girls, there were substantial similarities as well. Gender attitudes were affected by factors at the individual, family, peer, and societal levels, as well as by community engagement. Conclusions Our findings show that it is possible to shift gender attitudes toward greater equity and, in so doing, contribute to improved health and rights.

Suicidal Ideation Among Adolescents—The Role of Sexual Abuse, Depression, and Impulsive Behavior

“…The Population Council identified referral services for counseling and health services to offer respondents if necessary, and fieldworkers were trained on ethical issues and sensitivity. In addition, interviewing boys and girls in separate segments helped minimize issues related to confidentiality and response bias ( 44 ).…”

Association between school dropouts, early marriages, childbearing, and mental health in early adulthood of women: Evidence from a cohort study in Bihar, India

“…It is noteworthy that women who do not know their husband's age and their husband's education are more vulnerable to poor mental health. It is expected in a rural Indian society where marriages are performed at an early age, mostly arranged by the family with no consent of girls, where gender roles are also very critical (Patel, Santhya and Haberland, 2021). In such cases, women are less likely to know about their husband's characteristics.…”

Evaluating the Validity and Reliability of the Gender Equitable Men’s Scale Using a Longitudinal Cohort of Adolescent Girls and Young Women in South Africa

“…Correlated with aging into adulthood, this cohort also acquired higher educational attainment, became sexually active, experienced a pregnancy, and experienced intimate partner violence by visit 5; all of which have been shown to be associated with endorsement of gender equity. Even after accounting for some of these life experiences, increasing age has been shown to be independently associated with greater endorsement of gender equity among young women in other settings [ 38 ]. Results from an overlapping community randomized controlled trial in the study area also suggest that background gender norms in the community were improving irrespective of the community intervention, which included an equitable gender norms component [ 39 ].…”