2018
DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098664
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘What should I prescribe?’: time to improve reporting of resistance training programmes to ensure accurate translation and implementation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We analyzed the prescribed exercise dosage and not the actual exercise completed (adherence) which could also explain the lack of a positive dose-response relationship. Generally, this challenge of inadequate intervention reporting is a well-recognized challenge in non-pharmacological interventions 58 , not least in the reporting of exercise program details for patients with knee OA 59,60 . This creates challenges for many types of users of the published research, including clinicians, researches and patients.…”
Section: Dose-responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We analyzed the prescribed exercise dosage and not the actual exercise completed (adherence) which could also explain the lack of a positive dose-response relationship. Generally, this challenge of inadequate intervention reporting is a well-recognized challenge in non-pharmacological interventions 58 , not least in the reporting of exercise program details for patients with knee OA 59,60 . This creates challenges for many types of users of the published research, including clinicians, researches and patients.…”
Section: Dose-responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is further limited by a poor understanding and knowledge of physical activity guidelines among healthcare professionals [19][20][21], which provides challenges for its integration into sports medicine practice. Indeed, it is not uncommon for healthcare professionals to recommend "strengthening programmes" using 10 or more repetitions per set without a clear indication of the intensity adopted [22,23]. Although most of resistance training modes have demonstrated improvements in strength in inactive/untrained individuals during the first weeks [24], it must be pointed out that "strengthening programmes" and "strength training" are not the same; hence, they cannot be used interchangeably.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that the underpinning evidence for exercise dose in other conditions may be more robust. However, given the broad issues identified in the current review, we suggest this is unlikely and may not be limited to strengthening exercise in RA [ 14 ]. Thirdly, the novel and exploratory nature of this review meant we could not anticipate all of the challenges for grading the quality of the underpinning evidence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results indicate researchers need to improve not only the standard of reporting related to their interventions, but also the evidence they use to justify their decisions about what dose to prescribe. Reporting guidelines like TIDieR and CERT [ 8 , 30 ] should be used to raise standards going forward and as these evolve [ 14 ], could recommend researchers be explicit with type, quality, consistency and applicability of evidence they have used to support each dose parameter. Funders and peer reviewers should take a careful and critical approach when considering how exercise dose has been formulated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation