2022
DOI: 10.1111/jcal.12645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What should we evaluate when we use technology in education?

Abstract: Background: There is a lack of critical or empirical work interrogating the nature and purpose of evaluating technology use in education.Objectives: In this study, we examine the values underpinning the evaluation of technology use in education through field specialist perceptions. The study also poses critical reflections about the rigour of evaluation instruments development in the educational technology field.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
(104 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Vlachogianni and Tselios [19] adopted a system-usability scale to evaluate the usability of different educational resources and found that the majority of online resources, university websites, and tutoring platforms have good usability. Lai et al [20] identified the critical factors in evaluating the use of technology in the education sector, developed an instrument comprised of twenty-eight items belonging to eight different factors and evaluated its validity over a large set of students. Minamatov and Nasirdinova [21] highlighted that teachers need mastery in using digital technologies, such as text editors, spreadsheets, emails, browsers and multimedia equipment, to deliver quality education.…”
Section: Cybersecurity and Online Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vlachogianni and Tselios [19] adopted a system-usability scale to evaluate the usability of different educational resources and found that the majority of online resources, university websites, and tutoring platforms have good usability. Lai et al [20] identified the critical factors in evaluating the use of technology in the education sector, developed an instrument comprised of twenty-eight items belonging to eight different factors and evaluated its validity over a large set of students. Minamatov and Nasirdinova [21] highlighted that teachers need mastery in using digital technologies, such as text editors, spreadsheets, emails, browsers and multimedia equipment, to deliver quality education.…”
Section: Cybersecurity and Online Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, there is a need to combine these two research approaches and produce a valid and reliable tool for measuring academic teachers' digital competence. However, because TPACK focuses on teacher understanding, it cannot be immediately and directly and generally extended to the evaluation of technology use with students in schools and higher education institutions [83].…”
Section: Regarding the Predictor Construct Knowledge And Skills About...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identifying gaps between what is evaluated and what should be evaluated could result in valuable recommendations about the focus of future educational technology studies and the methods used to conduct evaluations [83]. According to Lai et al [83], the eight dimensions identified from the previous review of what had been evaluated [97], namely learning outcomes, affective elements, behaviour, design, technology, teaching/pedagogy, presence, and institutional environment, were all generally found to be valuable by the researchers and specialists.…”
Section: Other Constructs and Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blockchain technology allows users to be rewarded with discount vouchers for their activities. These vouchers might be converted into virtual currency [31]. A high user commitment will follow this system in the learning and teaching process if the socio-psychological human needs are addressed through face-to-face interaction and psychological compensations.…”
Section: He Objectives and Information And Data Literacymentioning
confidence: 99%