What Sin Is: A Differential Analysis

Couenhoven, Jesse

doi:10.1111/j.1468-0025.2009.01555.x

Cited by 7 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Hindriks (2018), 4. For some influential rationalist accounts of group agency, see List and Pettit (2011), French (1979), Collins (2019), Rovane (2014), Rovane (2004), and Rovane (1998). Questions have been raised about whether rationalism is a satisfactory understanding of moral agency.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Communal sin, atonement, and group non-agential moral responsibility

Cawdron

2023

Rel. Stud.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In analytic theology, corporate and/or communal accounts of moral responsibility are gaining recognition as a useful resource in numerous debates. One of the areas to which they have been applied is the atonement. It is thought that when Christ is atoning for the human community, one evades concerns about justice because it seems permissible for a member of a group to suffer punishment for the group's actions even if they are not morally responsible for these themselves. To establish the moral responsibility of the human community, one can either adopt group agency or utilize a non-agential form of group moral responsibility. I shall explore the latter option here and shall outline the understanding of communal sin undergirding the model.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Communal sin, atonement, and group non-agential moral responsibility

Cawdron

2023

Rel. Stud.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…From the perspectives of most Christian communities and believers, the biblical catalogue of sins does not by itself settle the question of what is sinful. Still, Couenhoven (2009) rightly observes that, other things being equal, the more a view of sin can accommodate and make sense of scriptural data together with other Christian speech and practices concerning sin, the more attractive it will be, and even sophisticated Christian epistemologies of sin must contend with the biblical data, 16 so I will focus there. Before I proceed, however, I must say a little bit about how the normative categories of impurity and sin are extensionally related.…”

Section: Cataloguing Sins In the Bible: Do Impurities Count?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Five problems for the moral consensus about sins

Ashfield

2021

Int J Philos Relig

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A number of Christian theologians and philosophers have been critical of overly moralizing approaches to the doctrine of sin, but nearly all Christian thinkers maintain that moral fault is necessary or sufficient for sin to obtain. Call this the "Moral Consensus." I begin by clarifying the relevance of impurities to the biblical cataloguing of sins. I then present four extensional problems for the Moral Consensus on sin, based on the biblical catalogue of sins: (1) moral overdemandingness, (2) agential unfairness, (3) moral repugnance, and (4) moral atrocity. Next, I survey several partial solutions to these problems, suggested by the recent philosophical literature. Then I evaluate two largely unexplored solutions: (a) genuine sin dilemmas and (b) defeasible sinfulness. I argue that (a) creates more problems than it solves and that, while (b) is wellmotivated and solves or eases each of the above problems, (b) leaves many biblical ordinances about sin morally misleading, creating (5) a pedagogical problem of evil. I conclude by arguing that (5) places hefty explanatory burdens on those who would appeal to (b) to resolve the four extensional problems discussed in this paper. So Christian thinkers may need to consider a more radical separation of sin and moral fault.Ingolf Dalferth (1984) distinguishes the ontological question 'what is sin?' from the criteriological question 'what is sinful?'. Much theological discourse on the doctrine of sin concerns the ontological question of sin's nature or essence, but recent philosophical discussions of sin have often grappled with the criteriological issue of which acts, attitudes, or states of affairs should count as sinful or fall under sin's extension, whatever sin turns out to be. In this paper, I identify problems that emerge from answers to the criteriological question of how sins are extensionally related to moral faults. My primary aim is to engage critically with recent relevant Englishspeaking philosophical scholarship, so I will not attempt an in-depth historical study of how theologians or philosophers have answered this question throughout the ages, and I will not address cognate theological topics, like soteriology. However, in setting up the problems I discuss, 1 I will refer primarily to the Hebrew Bible and the New Testament, because these are the primary authoritative canons of texts informing the religious traditions, in which recent English-speaking philosophical discussion of sin has taken place, and because the Christian traditions and their roots in Jewish traditions are the ones I know best.(237), but "sinful acts" is the narrower category, because it includes only conscious, voluntary, blameworthy offences that are objectively against God.Super-Moralists, in contrast, retain Moral Sufficiency while rejecting Moral Necessity, arguing that while all moral faults are sins, some sins are not moral faults. This combination of commitments seems to have been espoused by several prominent theologians. For example, Emil Brunner writes: "It is perfectly possi...

show abstract

Healing Creation or Hearing Confession: Protestant Liturgy and the Role of Agency, Sickness, and Repentance in the Current Ecological Crisis

Schiefelbein-Guerrero

2022

Sustainable Development Goals Series

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

What Sin Is: A Differential Analysis

Cited by 7 publications

References 5 publications

Communal sin, atonement, and group non-agential moral responsibility

Communal sin, atonement, and group non-agential moral responsibility

Five problems for the moral consensus about sins

Healing Creation or Hearing Confession: Protestant Liturgy and the Role of Agency, Sickness, and Repentance in the Current Ecological Crisis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About