2020
DOI: 10.1002/ab.21890
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What stops revenge taking? Effects of observed emotional reactions on revenge seeking

Abstract: What reaction stops revenge taking ? Four experiments (total N = 191) examined this question where the victim of an interpersonal transgression could observe the offender's reaction (anger, sadness, pain, or calm) to a retributive noise punishment.We compared the punishment intensity selected by the participant before and after seeing the offender's reaction. Seeing the opponent in pain reduced subsequent punishment most strongly, while displays of sadness and verbal indications of suffering had no appeasing … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(35 reference statements)
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, punishment may reflect a competitive orientation (in SVO terms): By punishing the transgressor, victims may simply aim at making the transgressor suffer (e.g., Baumeister et al, 1995;Fitness, 2001;Yoshimura, 2007), in line with the idea that people are intuitive retributivists who punish in accordance with the "eye for an eye" principle (Aharoni & Fridlund, 2012;Carlsmith & Darley, 2008; see also Eder et al, 2020;Gollwitzer et al, 2016). Likewise, punishment may aim at denigrating the transgressor, reducing their status/power, or demonstrating self-righteousness (i.e., "moralistic punishment"; Jordan & Rand, 2020;Kurzban et al, 2007;Nelissen, 2008).…”
Section: Punishment As a Post-transgression Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, punishment may reflect a competitive orientation (in SVO terms): By punishing the transgressor, victims may simply aim at making the transgressor suffer (e.g., Baumeister et al, 1995;Fitness, 2001;Yoshimura, 2007), in line with the idea that people are intuitive retributivists who punish in accordance with the "eye for an eye" principle (Aharoni & Fridlund, 2012;Carlsmith & Darley, 2008; see also Eder et al, 2020;Gollwitzer et al, 2016). Likewise, punishment may aim at denigrating the transgressor, reducing their status/power, or demonstrating self-righteousness (i.e., "moralistic punishment"; Jordan & Rand, 2020;Kurzban et al, 2007;Nelissen, 2008).…”
Section: Punishment As a Post-transgression Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We selected 12 pain videos from Study 1 and added 12 sadness videos taken from Eder et al (2020). Emotional ratings of the video materials are provided in the Supporting Information (Table S5).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present studies were designed to measure affective reactions towards revenge punishment outcomes in a structured competitive game. Participant and (fictitious) opponents interacted with each other via a competitive RT game similar to that used by Eder et al (2020). During each game round, the participant was asked to press the mouse button as quickly as possible after the appearance of a visual cue.…”
Section: The Present Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the psychological experience around a revenge episode is a function of the actors' messages, and vice-versa. These initial steps toward synthesizing social psychological and communication approaches to revenge suggest room for a more complete integration, as exemplified by recent studies by Gollwitzer and Denzler (2009), Funk et al (2014), and Eder et al (2020).…”
Section: Synthesis Of the Two Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further building on the above assumption, Eder et al (2020) examined the effects of observing an avengee's response to an initial act of revenge on an avenging party's ongoing pursuit of revenge. In three studies, participants viewed a video of their ostensible opponent's face as they meted out a sound‐blast in return for an earlier provocation.…”
Section: Synthesis Of the Two Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%