What Sustainable Development Goals Do Social Innovations Address? A Systematic Review and Content Analysis of Social Innovation Literature

Abstract

Interest in social innovations (SIs) from both the academic and the policy side is growing. Nonetheless, we still know little about which sustainable development goals (SDGs) SIs already address. Furthermore, only little is known about who the innovators developing and implementing SIs are. In this paper, we aim to bring more clarity and structure to the field of SIs. Firstly, a systematic literature review was conducted, before a content analysis was used to analyze the definitions used with regard to similarities. Secondly, all case studies described in the reviewed articles were then further systematically analyzed in order to identify the social or environmental problems addressed and the innovators involved. For the purpose of classifying the diverse types of problems, we used the globally known and broadly accepted 17 sustainable development goals (SDGs). Results showed that most SI case studies deal with an improvement of health and well-being. Furthermore, our study illustrates that there is a pronounced difference in the focus of SIs between developing and developed countries. Concerning the innovators, our results indicate that five types of innovators are fundamentally involved in developing and implementing SIs: social entrepreneurs, NGOs and non-profits, public institutions, civil society, firms, and social enterprises. Our definition analysis as well as the identification and classification of the innovators and addressed social needs bring much-needed clarity and structure to the field. However, our systematic review shows that SI is still in its infancy and it will be interesting to see where the field will head.

Entrepreneurship Education and Sustainable Development Goals: A literature Review and a Closer Look at Fragile States and Technology-Enabled Approaches

“…This paper therefore features a systematic literature review inspired by Eichler and Schwartz [19], where recent entrepreneurship publications in the EET area are analyzed with respect to their contribution to SDGs 1, 5, 8, 9, 10 and 12. Though the review revealed adequate emphasis on outcomes pertaining to SDG 8, several gaps in research and practice are identified that potentially hinder EET from advancing other SDGs, including a dearth of research on fragile states and demographic diversity, limited EET access to non-university students and a general lack of focus on educational technology, progressive education approaches and innovation in fragile countries compared to stable ones.…”

SDGs and Innovation in the Business Context Literature Review

“…In many works [82,[87][88][89], innovation and SDGs have proven to be closely connected, especially in the industrial sector [73], starting from the patenting process [59,90], passing through the strategies of open innovation [91], up to a focus on the frugal [92,93] and reverse innovation [94]. There is also a link between sustainability and the market [91], product and process innovation [95], and the possibility to connect the concept of innovation to each SDG [96].…”

Physical activity level as a booster of entrepreneurial intention: a social innovation approach

“…The interest in social innovation by the scientific community has been growing, as unveiled by the systematic review conducted by Eichler and Schwarz (2019).…”