2020
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/a5k3h
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What the Attentional-SNARC and its (null) replications can and cannot tell us

Abstract: In response to a recent point raised by Fischer at al. (2020), we discuss the theoretical implications of both the original Attentional SNARC (Att-SNARC) and its recent failed multi-laboratory replication. In our view, the theoretical importance of the original Att-SNARC can be summarized in two points: (1) there is a conceptual link between numbers and space, which can be observed as Spatial-Numerical Associations, and (2) Spatial-Numerical Associations are involuntary and automatic. We conclude that converge… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Colling et al (2020) tried to replicate Fischer’s (2003a) study with a cross-laboratory large sample and did not find an attentional SNARC effect. Some researchers ( Pellegrino et al, 2019 ; Cipora and Nuerk, 2020 ) claimed that attentional SNARC effect did not really exist in the field of positive numbers, and passive viewing of positive numbers did not cause attention to shift. However, Fischer et al (2020) proposed that these failed replication studies ignored the processing depth of number cuing, and “ depth of number processing is a likely moderator of the Att-SNARC effect ” (p. 163).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Colling et al (2020) tried to replicate Fischer’s (2003a) study with a cross-laboratory large sample and did not find an attentional SNARC effect. Some researchers ( Pellegrino et al, 2019 ; Cipora and Nuerk, 2020 ) claimed that attentional SNARC effect did not really exist in the field of positive numbers, and passive viewing of positive numbers did not cause attention to shift. However, Fischer et al (2020) proposed that these failed replication studies ignored the processing depth of number cuing, and “ depth of number processing is a likely moderator of the Att-SNARC effect ” (p. 163).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%