2007
DOI: 10.1177/194277510700200204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What the Research and Literature Say about the Delivery of Educational Leadership Preparation Programs in the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Downloaded by [Nanyang Technological University] The leadership for learning approach within the school-university partnership was an effective model for developing and preparing current and new leaders to become successful in today's challenging school climate. The results derived from this partnership model support previous work conducted by Preis et al (2007), which underscored the potential of partnerships as credible modes of delivery for leadership preparation programs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Downloaded by [Nanyang Technological University] The leadership for learning approach within the school-university partnership was an effective model for developing and preparing current and new leaders to become successful in today's challenging school climate. The results derived from this partnership model support previous work conducted by Preis et al (2007), which underscored the potential of partnerships as credible modes of delivery for leadership preparation programs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…As such, findings that suggest IMPACT V has encouraged not only transformational but also transformative sensibilities in building leaders are noteworthy. A strength of the program was its cohort model, an approach well supported by extant research (e.g., Preis et al, 2007). Importantly, IMPACT V exhorted building leaders to enact their learning, particularly through the integration of action planning/implementation and leadership coaching.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to that best practice, each program used a cohort model for the delivery of its instructional program based on the high quality curriculum; each had strong internship programs that fit their program delivery models; and each implemented an advisory model that also seemed to fit their scheme of program delivery. Although all of the former findings for the three partnerships were considered to be best practices in the research literature (e.g., Davis et al, 2005;Orr, 2006;Preis et al, 2007;Teitel, 2006) and earlier studies (Basom et al, 1996;Glasman & Glasman, 1997;Jackson & Kelley, 2002), the three partnerships were exemplary in (a) the development of high quality curriculum and delivery of instruction and (b) the commitment of the partnerships to provide support to the participants through advising and other forms of assistance.…”
Section: District-university Collaborationsmentioning
confidence: 97%