2019
DOI: 10.3233/ao-190217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What to consider about events: A survey on the ontology of occurrents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Symptom processes, it should be clear, are a particular sort of process. This makes symptom processes a member of the metaphysical category of occurrents-a category that includes the likes of processes, states, and events [see Rodrigues and Abel, 2019]. Interestingly, treatment actions also belong to this metaphysical category.…”
Section: Treatment Burdenmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Symptom processes, it should be clear, are a particular sort of process. This makes symptom processes a member of the metaphysical category of occurrents-a category that includes the likes of processes, states, and events [see Rodrigues and Abel, 2019]. Interestingly, treatment actions also belong to this metaphysical category.…”
Section: Treatment Burdenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intuitively, continuants are participants in occurrents. For more on the semantics of participation relationships, seeRodrigues and Abel [2019].12Smith et al [2011], for example, represent pain as a bodily process.13 As we will see, this idea of being obliged to participate in processes is one that is common to other types of burden (see Section 4). This makes sense when one considers the general nature of burdens.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A fundamental debate in Ontology as a philosophical discipline [7] regards the ontological status of events versus objects: a commonly held view is that objects continue to exist over time, hence they are also called "continuants", and events occur and/or unfold in time, hence they are also called "occurrents". The latter are sometimes further distinguished into events and processes [8][9][10][11][12][13]. Continuants are commonly thought of as primarily spatial, while occurrents as temporal par excellence.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ensure generality, it is postulated that the (canonically) causal relation holds between occurrents, their more specific characterization being open to interpretation (Kim, 1976;Davidson, 1980;Botti Benevides, Bourguet, Guizzardi, Peñaloza and Almeida, 2019;Rodrigues and Abel, 2019). The causal relation is generally acknowledged to be irreflexive and asymmetric.…”
Section: Toyoshima / Natural Necessity: An Introductory Guide For Ont...mentioning
confidence: 99%