2012
DOI: 10.1053/j.sult.2011.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What to Do With Incidental Thyroid Nodules on Imaging? An Approach for the Radiologist

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3,4 This factor may contribute to confusion, inconsistent reporting, and even overinvestigation of small thyroid nodules. This study evaluates how radiologists claim to report thyroid lesions incidentally detected on CT and MR imaging and quantifies the variability in this self-described practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…3,4 This factor may contribute to confusion, inconsistent reporting, and even overinvestigation of small thyroid nodules. This study evaluates how radiologists claim to report thyroid lesions incidentally detected on CT and MR imaging and quantifies the variability in this self-described practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review by Hoang et al 4 proposed a set of criteria for reporting ITNs on CT, MR imaging, and PET. The work-up system, known as the Duke 3-tiered system, has since been evaluated in a retrospective study that compared the 3-tiered system with a Ն10-mm-sized threshold for consecutive ITNs detected on CT neck studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Radiologists at Duke University have developed a system of reporting for these nodules that recommend work-up with ultrasound if the nodule seen in CT/ MRI/PET is greater or equal than 1.5 cm. Nodules not meeting these criteria should not be mentioned in the report (27). This reporting strategy could potentially reduce the fineneedle aspiration biopsy rate for thyroid incidentalomas by 34-46% (28).…”
Section: How To Do Bettermentioning
confidence: 99%