2014
DOI: 10.1111/ane.12250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What to expect after natalizumab cessation in a real-life setting

Abstract: Our data suggest that rebound of MS disease activity affects a subgroup of patients (11.9%), especially those with low disease activity before natalizumab therapy and a longer treatment gap after its withdrawal.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
43
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At 24 weeks after natalizumab cessation, there was a significant reduction in the annualized relapse rate between the pre-natalizumab period and the post-natalizumab period (2 vs 0.3; p = 0.009), 128 and a reduction in the mean number of relapses (1.1 vs 0.07), although no p values were reported, 120 according to fair quality evidence. At 52 weeks after natalizumab discontinuation, several studies of fair to poor quality reported a statistically significant reduction in the annualized relapse rate compared with that during the pre-natalizumab period 131,135,137,138 or described a reduction without statistical calculations. 123,126 However, other studies of fair quality reported no change in the annualized relapse rate and mean number of relapses between the two time periods.…”
Section: Review Questionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At 24 weeks after natalizumab cessation, there was a significant reduction in the annualized relapse rate between the pre-natalizumab period and the post-natalizumab period (2 vs 0.3; p = 0.009), 128 and a reduction in the mean number of relapses (1.1 vs 0.07), although no p values were reported, 120 according to fair quality evidence. At 52 weeks after natalizumab discontinuation, several studies of fair to poor quality reported a statistically significant reduction in the annualized relapse rate compared with that during the pre-natalizumab period 131,135,137,138 or described a reduction without statistical calculations. 123,126 However, other studies of fair quality reported no change in the annualized relapse rate and mean number of relapses between the two time periods.…”
Section: Review Questionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Across 11 studies, 2 reported no evidence of rebound 123,135 and 1 reported no evidence of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. 128 The proportion of participants showing evidence of rebound ranged, in most of the studies, from 9% to 12%, 126,127,131,132,137 whereas other authors reported higher rebounds, including 14%, 136 21.2% 134 and 38.3%. 138 Relapse outcomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In a Danish cohort, 83/375 (22.1%) of patients presented a rebound after stopping the treatment (Sorensen et al., ). Another analysis of 200 patients who discontinued NTZ, 11.9% present a rebound activity (Salhofer‐Polanyi et al., ). Recently, an analysis of 47 NTZ withdrawals found a significant clinical worsening (defined as a two‐step EDSS increase) in 19% of patients (Vidal‐Jordana et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rebound rate varies among studies between 10% and 30% of patients (Gueguen et al, 2014;Havla et al, 2011;Kerbrat et al, 2011;Miravalle et al, 2011;Rinaldi et al, 2012;Salhofer-Polanyi et al, 2014;Sorensen et al, 2014;Vidal-Jordana et al, 2015). The reactivation of the disease activity occurs frequently within the 3-6 months after NTZ cessation, in relation with the drug pharmacodynamics features (Kerbrat et al, 2011;O'Connor et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation