What to Write in Each Segment of an Original Article?

Mondal, Himel; Mondal, Shaikat; Saha, Koushik

doi:10.4103/ijves.ijves_38_19

Cited by 3 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the same vein, Ripple et al 2011called for inclusion of abstracts in the IMRD format, as it can enhance the chance of nding optimal readership. Similar concerns have been echoed by Mondal et al (2019) who stated that traditional IMRD format does not capture the macro structure of RAs, and they proposed "IaMRDS" format which is the acronym for "Introduction with aim, Materials and Methods, Results, Discussion, and Conclusion". In spite of the criticisms levelled against IMRD, it is a well-established tradition in RA studies (Ruiying & Allison, 2003).…”

Section: Macro Structure Of Rasmentioning

confidence: 76%

A Corpus-based Analysis of Phrasal Complexity across Different Sections of Research Articles in two Academic Disciplines

Esfandiari¹,

Ahmadi²

2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Complexity measures in academic writing have experienced a shift from clausal to phrasal indices in recent years. Drawing on a subset of Biber et al. (2011) hypothesized stages of writing development, we explored phrasal complexity across sections of research articles (RAs) in applied linguistics and clinical medicine. A 389,332-word corpus consisting of 80 randomly selected RAs from leading journals in applied linguistics and clinical medicine was compiled for the purposes of the present study. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and independent-samples t-test, as implemented in SPSS (version 25), were employed to find differences across the RA sections and between two groups of academic writers. The findings indicated that RAs in clinical medicine relied more heavily on noun phrase modifiers in all sections than those in applied linguistics, suggesting that the distributional pattern of these linguistic expressions is discipline-independent. The implications of the findings are also discussed.

show abstract

Section: Macro Structure Of Rasmentioning

confidence: 76%

A Corpus-based Analysis of Phrasal Complexity across Different Sections of Research Articles in two Academic Disciplines

Esfandiari¹,

Ahmadi²

2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…While Swales (1990) claimed that IMRD macrostructure is the robust format of RAs, Ruiying and Allison (2003) argue that IMRD structure cannot be taken for granted in that the headings do not always reflect the rhetorical functions of each section explicitly, and that there are variations among the authors in the use of the established IMRD format in RAs. Similar concerns have been echoed by Mondal et al (2019), who stated that traditional IMRD format does not capture the macro structure of RAs, and they proposed "IaMRDS" format which is the acronym for "Introduction with aim, Materials and Methods, Results, Discussion, and Conclusion". In spite of the criticisms levelled against IMRD, it is a well-established tradition in RA studies (Ruiying & Allison, 2003).…”

Section: Macro Structure Of Rasmentioning

confidence: 77%

“…However, IMRD is only one format for investigating text-intrinsic language features (those features which are attributed to macro-structures of the texts) of RAs. Future studies may employ other formats (see Mondal et al, 2019) that accurately capture the macrostructures of RAs. The present study investigated only one dimension of language complexity (phrasal complexity).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Corpus-based Analysis of Noun Phrase Complexity in Research Article Part-genres in Applied Linguistics and Clinical Medicine

Esfandiari

Ahmadi²

2022

LRR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Complexity measures in academic writing have experienced a shift from clausal to phrasal indices in recent years. Drawing on a subset of Biber et al."s ( 2011) hypothesized stages of writing development, we explored phrasal complexity across sections (part-genres) of research articles (RAs) in applied linguistics and clinical medicine. A 389,332-word corpus consisting of 80 randomly selected RAs from leading journals in applied linguistics and clinical medicine was compiled for the purposes of the present study. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and independent-samples t-test, as implemented in SPSS (version 25), were employed to find differences across the RA sections and between two groups of academic writers. The findings indicated that RAs in clinical medicine relied more heavily on noun phrase modifiers in all sections than those in applied linguistics, suggesting that the distributional pattern of these linguistic expressions is discipline-independent. The implications of the distributional pattern of phrasal complexity are discussed in relation to L2 writing pedagogy and the development of genrebased, discipline-specific academic writing.

show abstract

“…A quick guideline about the sections of a research paper is found in the article by Mondal et al . [ 12 ] In addition to writing the manuscript, researchers need to write a cover letter to provide a glimpse of the research paper. This letter may be the first thing the journal editor would see.…”

Section: Research Mapmentioning

confidence: 99%

ChatGPT in academic writing: Maximizing its benefits and minimizing the risks

Mondal,

Mondal

2023

Indian Journal of Ophthalmology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This review article explores the use of ChatGPT in academic writing and provides insights on how to utilize it judiciously. With the increasing popularity of AI-powered language models, ChatGPT has emerged as a potential tool for assisting writers in the research and writing process. We have provided a list of potential uses of ChatGPT by a novice researcher for getting help during research proposal preparation and manuscript writing. However, there are concerns regarding its reliability and potential risks associated with its use. The review highlights the importance of maintaining human judgment in the writing process and using ChatGPT as a complementary tool rather than a replacement for human effort. The article concludes with recommendations for researchers and writers to ensure responsible and effective use of ChatGPT in academic writing.

show abstract

What to Write in Each Segment of an Original Article?

Cited by 3 publications

References 3 publications

A Corpus-based Analysis of Phrasal Complexity across Different Sections of Research Articles in two Academic Disciplines

A Corpus-based Analysis of Phrasal Complexity across Different Sections of Research Articles in two Academic Disciplines

A Corpus-based Analysis of Noun Phrase Complexity in Research Article Part-genres in Applied Linguistics and Clinical Medicine

ChatGPT in academic writing: Maximizing its benefits and minimizing the risks

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About