2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10614-017-9752-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Types are There?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We start by briefly recapturing the Cosaert (2019) partitioning procedure, which is based on the original work of Crawford and Pendakur (2013). Next, we show how to recover preference heterogeneity contained within various observable characteristics.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We start by briefly recapturing the Cosaert (2019) partitioning procedure, which is based on the original work of Crawford and Pendakur (2013). Next, we show how to recover preference heterogeneity contained within various observable characteristics.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Operationally, it boils down to partitioning the sample into subsets so that each individual subset satisfies the generalized axiom of revealed preference (GARP); the minimum number of preference types then corresponds to the partitioning with minimum cardinality (for more details, see Crawford and Pendakur 2013). More recently, Cosaert (2019) addresses the computational complexity of the original Crawford and Pendakur procedure. 1 He introduced a graph-theoretical approach to identify the number of types that is based on the weak axiom of revealed preferences (WARP) (instead of GARP).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Crawford and Pendakur (2013) also consider this problem in the context of preference heterogeneity, and provide algorithms for computing upper and lower bounds on the number of 'dictators'. Cosaert (2017) links this to the problem of computing the chromatic number of a graph. Furthermore, Cosaert formulates an integer program to partition the observations into sets, so that the observed characteristics within each set are as homogenous as possible.…”
Section: Collective Choicesmentioning
confidence: 99%