2020
DOI: 10.1097/qad.0000000000002612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What we talk about when we talk about durable viral suppression

Abstract: As policies built on ‘Undetectable = Untransmittable’ become more popular, use of durable viral suppression (DVS) as an outcome in analyses is increasing. We identified a case series of recent HIV-related publications that study the DVS outcome. The majority did not distinguish between a definition of DVS and the operationalization of that definition. Clearer discussion of DVS, including a formal definition, is needed to ensure better comparability across studies and ultimately better public health outcomes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, we focused on DVS instead of one-time achievement unlike prior studies [28,42]. This is important, as benefits are only achieved if suppression is durable [28], and it is known that suppression is not always sustained [42]. Although the DVS achievement in our sample seems high, this number is comparable to 90% DVS rate reported by Ryan White Clinics, which primarily serve un/under-insured PWH [45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…First, we focused on DVS instead of one-time achievement unlike prior studies [28,42]. This is important, as benefits are only achieved if suppression is durable [28], and it is known that suppression is not always sustained [42]. Although the DVS achievement in our sample seems high, this number is comparable to 90% DVS rate reported by Ryan White Clinics, which primarily serve un/under-insured PWH [45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Our work extends the literature in two ways. First, we focused on DVS instead of one-time achievement unlike prior studies [28,42]. This is important, as benefits are only achieved if suppression is durable [28], and it is known that suppression is not always sustained [42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, while most published randomized trials used the definition of virologic suppression as HIV RNA viral load less than 50 copies/ml, we chose to use the threshold of HIV RNA less than 200 copies/ml as there was a portion of cohorts during this study period that had HIV viral load measurement with lower limit of detect greater than 50 copies/ml during 2009-2016. Future research could also focus on durable viral suppression (defined as consistent viral suppression for at least 12 months prior) if viral loads are measured more frequently [30]. Third, potential selection bias may exist as we did not account for death that occurred after the last measurement of viral load.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Young people, especially women and key populations, continue to have a disproportionately low level of viral suppression 4. One goal of HIV care and treatment is achieving an undetectable viral load as it confers benefits at both the individual and public health level 8 9. There is strong evidence that supports that PLHIV cannot sexually transmit HIV to others when their viral load is suppressed to 200 HIV RNA copies/mL or lower, and they have been adherent to ART for at least 6 months 8 10–12…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%