“…In this context, a clear understanding of catalyst interfacial processes such as dynamic chemical/structural/electronic evolution, formation/interaction of key electroactive intermediates, and dominant reaction pathways, is required to rationalize the selection of design strategies and to drive the knowledge-based development of next-generation biomass valorization/HER electrocatalysts. Combination of (photo-)electrochemical and cutting-edge in situ characterization techniques under operation can offer valuable insights at atomic-level to this end, leading to emergence of a wide range of in situ microscopic and spectroscopic methods, such as surface interrogation-scanning electrochemical microscopy (SI-SECM) [115][116][117] , transmission electron microscopy (TEM) 118 , Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), 59,119,120 vibrational sum-frequency generation (vSFG), [121][122][123] Raman spectroscopy, [124][125][126][127] X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS), [128][129][130] X-ray diffraction (XRD), 131,132 and Xray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). 133,134 In addition to these landmarks, facilitating the use of machine-learning methods for theoretical calculation is versatile approach for in-depth kinetic modeling of the focused catalyst interfaces, which can be used to predict the reaction mechanism by calculating the energy levels of the electrons in the catalytic material and the interactions between the electrons and the ions in the electrolyte.…”