2001
DOI: 10.1080/00015458.2001.12098626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“What You See Is Not What You Get” A Plea to Remove A ‘Normal’ Appendix During Diagnostic Laparoscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“… 7 Chiarugi et al also support this argument, demonstrating a high false negative rate for diagnostic laparoscopy with pathological changes found in 58% of normal looking appendices removed. 11 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 7 Chiarugi et al also support this argument, demonstrating a high false negative rate for diagnostic laparoscopy with pathological changes found in 58% of normal looking appendices removed. 11 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many surgeons advocate appendectomy in a macroscopically normal appendix stating that inflammation on the mucosa may be missed 26 , 27 ; others have shown that a normal-looking appendix may be left in place safely. 28 This series has demonstrated that appendicitis can be missed on naked eye examination as shown in Table 2 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, more than 30% of the resected appendices had histological evidence of submucosal inflammation and periappendicitis, although macroscopically they appeared normal. Other authors have described microscopic abnormalities in apparently non-inflamed appendices in similar proportions (27,28) . Performing appendectomy avoids both possible secondary acute appendicitis and subsequent intussusception.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%