The Routledge Companion to Qualitative Research in Organization Studies 2017
DOI: 10.4324/9781315686103-16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whatddya Know?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The respondents were asked about activities and daily routines and retrospective accounts related to resourcing. Face-to-face interviews helped to build trust with the respondents (Baker et al, 2017), which proved crucial in gaining privileged access to their life worlds (Dodd et al, 2021; Pratt et al, 2019). As a result, we gained access to sensitive information such as real-time emails, collaboration contracts, internal reports, and so on.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The respondents were asked about activities and daily routines and retrospective accounts related to resourcing. Face-to-face interviews helped to build trust with the respondents (Baker et al, 2017), which proved crucial in gaining privileged access to their life worlds (Dodd et al, 2021; Pratt et al, 2019). As a result, we gained access to sensitive information such as real-time emails, collaboration contracts, internal reports, and so on.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, these data were supplemented by real-time email communications between Helena, Jennifer, and Bertha, which provided rich information allowing us to see what was going on in a similar to observation (Neergaard & Ulhøi, 2007). The lead author was copied into the email exchanges (Baker et al, 2017; Parris, 2008) (using the “cc” function). Having access to real-time email interaction data provided an opportunity to follow how the practice unfolded prior to and following the unexpected situation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of the successful use of diary studies in other disciplines, the dangerously reductive path of a lack of diversity in qualitative methodology and/or methodological narrowing in entrepreneurship studies (Baker et al, 2017) has limited the exploitation of diary studies as a viable methodology. For instance, an entrepreneurship methodology review by McDonald et al (2015) revealed that of the 3749 journal articles published in the top entrepreneurship journals between 1985 and 2013, 1720 were based on survey data, 519 were categorized as case studies and only three (.09%) used diary studies.…”
Section: Contextual Use Of Diary Studies In Entrepreneurship Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Baker et al (2017) suggests that unlike organisational research, the foci in entrepreneurship research often condense to the individual and the need to understand their individual experiences of entrepreneurial constructs. Yet, in spite of the large volume of empirical research generated in entrepreneurship, there is a clear knowledge gap in methodology that adequately captures the within-individual relationships (Uy et al, 2010; Van Burg & Karlsson, 2020; Wiklund et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, not all qualitative research in entrepreneurship fits these templates, as they explore different types of phenomena or embrace different (ontological) assumptions. Besides the issue of fit, the general progress in the field of entrepreneurship might even be hampered when researchers restrict themselves to a limited number of dominant templates for qualitative research (e.g., Baker et al, 2017; Cornelissen, 2017; Eisenhardt et al, 2016; Gehman et al, 2018; Köhler et al, 2019). Second and relatedly, such templates encourage researchers to follow a particular format and style, overlooking the breadth of approaches qualitative research has to offer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%