2018
DOI: 10.18174/odjar.v4i0.15829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wheat response to a wide range of temperatures, as determined from the Hot Serial Cereal (HSC) Experiment

Abstract: Abstract:Temperatures are warming on a global scale, a phenomenon that likely will affect future crop productivity. Crop growth models are useful tools to predict the likely effects of these global changes on agricultural productivity and to develop strategies to maximize the benefits and minimize the detriments of such changes. However, few such models have been tested at the higher temperatures expected in the future. Therefore, a "Hot Serial Cereal" experiment was conducted on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first one was the Hot Serial Cereal (HSC) experiment conducted in Maricopa (33°4ˈN, 111°58ˈW, 358 m elevation), AZ, USA, where the spring wheat cultivar Yecora Rojo was sown about every 6 weeks for 2 years (Wall et al , 2011; White et al , 2012). The data of the HSC experiment were obtained from Kimball et al (2018). This experiment provides a very large range of temperature (average temperature between crop emergence and appearance of the flag-leaf = 9.6–22.3 °C) and photoperiod (10.1–13.9 h), with mean daily PTQ ranging from 1.2–3.8 mol m −2 °Cd −1 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first one was the Hot Serial Cereal (HSC) experiment conducted in Maricopa (33°4ˈN, 111°58ˈW, 358 m elevation), AZ, USA, where the spring wheat cultivar Yecora Rojo was sown about every 6 weeks for 2 years (Wall et al , 2011; White et al , 2012). The data of the HSC experiment were obtained from Kimball et al (2018). This experiment provides a very large range of temperature (average temperature between crop emergence and appearance of the flag-leaf = 9.6–22.3 °C) and photoperiod (10.1–13.9 h), with mean daily PTQ ranging from 1.2–3.8 mol m −2 °Cd −1 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These four plantings are not reported here. Experimental data for these plantings and additional measurements for all plantings, including detailed phenological stages, leaf emergence rate (Haun stage), soil and canopy temperature, vegetation index (NDVI), leaf level gas exchange and water relations, and grain quality data are reported in a separate paper (Kimball et al, 2018). Maximum and minimum values of daily air temperatures were obtained primarily from a weather station at the experimental field.…”
Section: Field Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental data presented here were also used in a modeling study of AgMIP-Wheat where canopy temperature models were evaluated for nine of the 30 wheat models used in Asseng et al (2015) (Webber et al, 2016) and in an earlier study where energy balance and canopy temperature simulated by the wheat model ecosys were evaluated (Grant et al, 2011). Measured canopy temperature and energy balance data were reported in Kimball et al (2018).…”
Section: Simulation Of Field Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental data from the Braunschweig FACE studies on wheat growth responses to elevated CO 2 in combination with nitrogen supply or infrared warming during grain filling 1 BACKGROUND: Climate change due to rising atmospheric CO2 concentration and associated increase in temperature, heat waves and drought periods will have important implications for global food production (IPCC, 2013). A variety of field studies have already been conducted to investigate the effect of elevated CO2 concentration (eCO2) on wheat and such resultant datasets (e.g., Kimball et al, 2017Kimball et al, , 2018 have been used by crop modelers to assess the effects of climate change on global wheat production (Rosenzweig et al, 2014;Asseng et al, 2019). However, there are still uncertainties particularly regarding the interaction of CO2 and N supply on wheat growth as well as the effect of eCO2 on plant N dynamics (Rosenzweig et al, 2014;Vanuytrecht & Thorburn, 2017).On the other hand, the beneficial effect of eCO2 on stomatal conductance has been well documented in many experiments (Ainsworth & Rogers, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%