2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wheelchair propulsion demands during outdoor community ambulation

Abstract: Objective-Quantify manual wheelchair propulsion effort during outdoor community ambulation. Design-Case seriesSubjects-Thirteen individuals (12 with SCI, 1 with spina bifida) who were experienced manual wheelchair users and had no current upper extremity injury or pain complaints.Methods-Measurements were obtained from instrumented wheelchair rims during steady-state propulsion as subjects traversed outdoor concrete sidewalk terrain that included smooth level, aggregate level, and a ramp with a smooth surface.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
29
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…35 That may be attributable to the size and visibility of this AT, to difficulties transporting them, and to environmental accessibility issues associated with their use. 5254 Other types of AT appeared to yield generally positive outcomes, although caregiver complaints were noted about the need to provide verbal cueing when cognitive AT was used. 32, 43 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 That may be attributable to the size and visibility of this AT, to difficulties transporting them, and to environmental accessibility issues associated with their use. 5254 Other types of AT appeared to yield generally positive outcomes, although caregiver complaints were noted about the need to provide verbal cueing when cognitive AT was used. 32, 43 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Energy required for the wheelchair to move is lowest on smooth, hardened surfaces, while it increases by as much as 40% on uneven hardened surfaces [10], whereas riding on a non-hardened surface, due to the high energy requirement, may prove to be impossible or even dangerous.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A significant correlation between right- and left-side values has been cited as rationale for not evaluating wheelchair propulsion as a bilateral task. 8,1820 Other investigations have, however, reported side-to-side differences in power production 11,21 and stroke patterns 22 during wheelchair propulsion. We have recently measured bilateral power production across varying level and inclined terrain, and found that as the terrain became more challenging, the power produced by the dominant extremity was greater than the nondominant extremity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Side-to-side differences between extremities have included greater power production from the dominant limb during manual wheelchair propulsion across outdoor terrain. 11 Therefore, we also hypothesized there would be significant differences between extremities for kinetic variables, with forces and moments measured for the dominant upper extremity to be significantly higher than the nondominant extremity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%